Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
RequireJS vs Webpack: What are the differences?
Key Differences between RequireJS and Webpack
1. Module Loading Approach: RequireJS uses an asynchronous module loading approach where modules are loaded on-demand as the dependencies are resolved. On the other hand, Webpack uses a bundling approach where all the modules and their dependencies are bundled into a single file, resulting in a static dependency graph.
2. Configuration: RequireJS requires a separate configuration file (require.config) where you specify the module paths and dependencies. In contrast, Webpack uses a single configuration file (webpack.config) that provides a more centralized and flexible way to manage the entire build process.
3. Code Splitting: RequireJS does not have built-in support for code splitting, which makes it harder to split application code into smaller bundles and load them asynchronously. In contrast, Webpack has built-in support for code splitting, allowing developers to easily split their code into separate chunks and load them on-demand, resulting in faster initial page loads.
4. Loaders: RequireJS does not support loaders by default, making it harder to preprocess files or perform transformations on the imported modules. On the other hand, Webpack has a powerful concept of loaders, which allows developers to preprocess and transform different types of files, such as CSS, JSON, and images, using loaders.
5. Hot Module Replacement: RequireJS does not have built-in support for hot module replacement, which means that developers need to manually refresh the page when making changes to the code. In contrast, Webpack has built-in support for hot module replacement, enabling developers to see the changes instantly without a page refresh, making the development process more efficient.
6. Community and Ecosystem: RequireJS has been around for a longer time and has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. However, Webpack has gained popularity in recent years and has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide range of plugins to enhance the development experience.
In summary, RequireJS and Webpack differ in their module loading approach, configuration, code splitting, support for loaders, hot module replacement, and community ecosystem. Webpack provides a more modern and flexible way of managing JavaScript modules and has several advantages over RequireJS, such as built-in code splitting and hot module replacement support.
I could define the next points why we have to migrate:
- Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
- Also
jspm install
takes much more time thannpm install
. - Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.
Pros of RequireJS
- Open source79
- Modular script loader69
- Asynchronous66
- Great for AMD49
- Fast30
- Free14
Pros of Webpack
- Most powerful bundler309
- Built-in dev server with livereload182
- Can handle all types of assets142
- Easy configuration87
- Laravel-mix22
- Overengineered, Underdeveloped4
- Makes it easy to bundle static assets2
- Webpack-Encore2
- Redundant1
- Better support in Browser Dev-Tools1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of RequireJS
Cons of Webpack
- Hard to configure15
- No clear direction5
- Spaghetti-Code out of the box2
- SystemJS integration is quite lackluster2
- Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)2
- Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers2