StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Restier vs Retrofit

Restier vs Retrofit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Retrofit
Retrofit
Stacks386
Followers198
Votes0
GitHub Stars43.8K
Forks7.3K
Restier
Restier
Stacks4
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars477
Forks140

Restier vs Retrofit: What are the differences?

  1. Data Sources: The key difference between Restier and Retrofit is that Restier is specifically designed for building OData services on top of .NET, making it ideal for .NET developers who require a simple way to expose their data sources as OData services. On the other hand, Retrofit is a type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java, primarily used for consuming RESTful web services.

  2. Language Compatibility: Restier is more focused on integrating with the .NET ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage the power of C# and other .NET languages to build OData services efficiently. In contrast, Retrofit caters to Java and Android developers, providing a seamless integration with these languages and platforms for consuming RESTful APIs.

  3. Development Approach: Restier follows a data-driven development approach, enabling developers to define their data models and easily expose them as OData services without delving into low-level implementation details. Conversely, Retrofit emphasizes a more manual approach where developers need to create interfaces for defining API endpoints and handling HTTP requests and responses.

  4. Supported Platforms: Restier is primarily targeted towards the .NET platform, offering seamless integration with Entity Framework and ASP.NET for building OData services. On the other hand, Retrofit is designed for Java and Android platforms, providing extensive support for features such as asynchronous requests, custom headers, and request/response interception.

  5. Ease of Use: Restier provides a high-level abstraction for building OData services, allowing developers to focus on defining their data models rather than handling intricate CRUD operations and HTTP protocols. Retrofit, on the other hand, requires developers to manually define API interfaces and manage HTTP calls, which may involve more boilerplate code compared to Restier.

  6. Community Support: While Restier has a dedicated community of .NET developers who contribute to the framework's development and provide support through forums and discussions, Retrofit benefits from the extensive support of the Java and Android developer community, ensuring a wealth of resources, tutorials, and libraries for integrating Retrofit into projects.

In Summary, Restier is tailored for .NET developers to easily build OData services, while Retrofit is a Java and Android-centric HTTP client for consuming RESTful APIs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Retrofit
Retrofit
Restier
Restier

Retrofit turns your HTTP API into a Java interface

It is a RESTful API development framework for building standardized, OData V4 based RESTful services on .NET platform. It can be seen as a middle-ware on top of Web API OData.

URL parameter replacement and query parameter support; Object conversion to request body (e.g., JSON, protocol buffers); Multipart request body and file upload
Transparent to security; Entity Set Filters; Allows users to authorize a submit operation or plug in user logic (such as logging) before and after a submit operation; supports ETag starting from version 0.6; Model Building
Statistics
GitHub Stars
43.8K
GitHub Stars
477
GitHub Forks
7.3K
GitHub Forks
140
Stacks
386
Stacks
4
Followers
198
Followers
7
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Retrofit, Restier?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope