StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. RestSharp vs Soap UI

RestSharp vs Soap UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Soap UI
Soap UI
Stacks240
Followers157
Votes3
RestSharp
RestSharp
Stacks743
Followers37
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.8K
Forks2.3K

RestSharp vs Soap UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web services testing, two popular tools are RestSharp and SoapUI. While both tools serve the purpose of API testing, they differ in their functionality and approach. In this Markdown document, we will explore the key differences between RestSharp and SoapUI in a concise manner.

  1. Execution Environment: RestSharp is primarily used for executing RESTful API tests, whereas SoapUI is designed for testing SOAP-based web services. RestSharp provides a simpler and more streamlined approach to consuming and testing REST APIs, while SoapUI offers extensive functionalities for testing SOAP APIs, including support for WSDL parsing, soap message generation, and assertions for SOAP-specific elements.

  2. User Interface: RestSharp is a lightweight library and does not provide a graphical user interface (GUI). It is typically used as an API client library to be integrated into code-based test frameworks. On the other hand, SoapUI offers a feature-rich GUI, allowing users to create, modify, and execute tests without the need for extensive coding.

  3. Data Format Support: RestSharp provides native support for parsing and serializing JSON and XML data formats, making it suitable for RESTful API testing. SoapUI, being specialized in SOAP testing, supports XML extensively with built-in XML schema validation, request/response parsing, and manipulation capabilities. While both tools can handle XML, RestSharp focuses more on JSON format, whereas SoapUI is optimized for XML-based payloads.

  4. Authentication Support: RestSharp provides easy-to-use authentication methods such as basic authentication, OAuth, and API keys, enabling testers to authenticate their API requests efficiently. SoapUI, being a comprehensive testing tool, supports a wider range of authentication methods, including WS-Security, NTLM, and Kerberos, which are commonly used in SOAP-based services.

  5. Extensibility and Customization: RestSharp offers a flexible and extensible architecture, allowing users to create custom serializers, authentication handlers, and request/response filters to tailor the client behavior as per their project requirements. SoapUI, despite having a powerful built-in functionality, also supports extensions through Groovy scripting, enabling users to create custom assertions, data sources, and other customizations.

  6. Additional Features: While both RestSharp and SoapUI provide core functionality for API testing, they differ in additional features. SoapUI offers advanced features like load testing, security testing, and mock services, making it a comprehensive tool for SOAP-based testing and integration. RestSharp, being a lightweight library, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for simple API testing purposes.

In summary, RestSharp is a lightweight library primarily used for RESTful API testing, while SoapUI is a feature-rich tool specializing in SOAP-based web services testing, with a graphical user interface and additional functionalities like load testing and security testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Soap UI
Soap UI
RestSharp
RestSharp

It is an open source functional Testing tool for API Testing. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS, AMF and JDBC. It supports functional tests, security tests, and virtualization.

It is probably the most popular HTTP client library for .NET. Featuring automatic serialization and deserialization, request and response type detection, variety of authentications and other useful features

-
Serialization; Sync and Async; Extensive configuration; Authentication; Forms, request body, and files
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
240
Stacks
743
Followers
157
Followers
37
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Soap UI, RestSharp?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope