StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Reviewable vs Stylelint

Reviewable vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Reviewable
Reviewable
Stacks17
Followers32
Votes23
Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986

Reviewable vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

  1. Integration: Reviewable is primarily used for code review and collaboration among team members, integrating seamlessly with version control systems like GitHub. On the other hand, Stylelint is a linter tool specifically designed for checking CSS code quality, enforcing coding standards, and identifying problematic patterns without direct integration with version control systems.

  2. Scope: Reviewable focuses on reviewing changes made to code, providing diff views, comments, and facilitating discussions on specific lines of code. In contrast, Stylelint concentrates solely on analyzing CSS files to ensure adherence to predefined style rules, syntax consistency, and best practices.

  3. Automated Checks: Reviewable allows for automated testing and continuous integration setups for running tests and checking the quality of code changes. Stylelint, being a linter, performs automated checks on CSS code during development, alerting developers to errors or deviations from the established style guidelines.

  4. Customization: Reviewable offers configurable settings for code review workflows, team permissions, notifications, and merging changes, enhancing collaboration and flexibility. Meanwhile, Stylelint allows developers to customize linting rules, ignore specific errors, and enforce project-specific style guidelines by configuring the tool according to project requirements.

  5. Supported Languages: Reviewable primarily supports code reviews for various programming languages, including but not limited to JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Go. In contrast, Stylelint is specifically tailored for analyzing and enforcing style rules within CSS files, omitting the support for other programming languages.

  6. Feedback Mechanism: Reviewable enables reviewers to provide feedback, comments, and suggestions directly within the code diffs, facilitating clear communication and effective collaboration during the review process. While Stylelint offers feedback in the form of error messages and warnings based on linting rules, the feedback mechanism is not as interactive or collaborative as in Reviewable.

In Summary, Reviewable focuses on code review and collaboration with integration support, while Stylelint is a CSS-specific linter tool for ensuring code quality and adherence to style rules, with no direct integration with version control systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Reviewable, Stylelint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Reviewable
Reviewable
Stylelint
Stylelint

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).;Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.;Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.;Tracks reviewed files, unreplied / unresolved comments.;Comments map across code changes, never disappear.;Send all comments in one batch, or one at a time.;Open files on the right line directly in your editor.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
986
Stacks
17
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
32
Followers
100
Votes
23
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Batch commenting
  • 4
    Makes me feel organised and in control
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Easy incremental reviewing
  • 3
    Efficient comment paging
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Reviewable, Stylelint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana