Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
RocketChat vs Total.js Messenger: What are the differences?
Integration with other tools: RocketChat provides more integrations with third-party tools and services compared to Total.js Messenger, allowing users to connect with a wider range of applications seamlessly.
Customization and flexibility: Total.js Messenger offers more customization options and flexibility in terms of design, themes, and features, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs and preferences more extensively than RocketChat.
Performance and scalability: RocketChat is known for its superior performance and scalability, especially in large organizations or enterprises with high user volumes, making it a more suitable choice for businesses with demanding requirements in these areas.
Security features: Total.js Messenger offers more advanced security features and compliance options, ensuring data protection and privacy for its users, making it a preferred choice for organizations with strict security protocols and regulations to comply with.
Community support and development: RocketChat has a larger and more active community of developers and users, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and support options for users, making it easier to find solutions to issues and expand the platform's functionality.
Ease of use and user interface: Total.js Messenger is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it a more suitable option for users with limited technical knowledge or experience, who prefer a straightforward and intuitive platform.
In Summary, RocketChat and Total.js Messenger differ in terms of integration, customization, performance, security, community support, and user-friendliness, catering to different user needs and preferences.
Mattermost sports higher performance, uses Postgres, is a pure server side application not using up too much of system resources on the client side, and gives an overall enterprise grade impression in general.
Updates go smooth without a hassle, everything is organised logically, and the integration with the OS is absolutely stable. Apart from that, the underlying runtimes and code are mature, proven and stable.
The developers are maybe a bit more cautious in regard to introducing new features, but they maintain a stable experience, not breaking the codebase in order to hastily implement bells and whistles, which are not yet ready for production. Documentation and debugging are fantastic, so running this in enterprise production environment is absolutely approved of.
We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.
Pros of RocketChat
- Open source72
- Can be deployed on premise38
- Byos (bring your own server)32
- Faster than Slack30
- Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch21
- Built using meteor19
- Desktop client for mac and windows19
- Easily deployed on Cloud Services (Heroku, etc)13
- Screen Sharing10
- Video and audio9
- Excellent support & service, bar-none9
- Web client6
- Amazing product, fast moving development, and BYOS5
- Multiple Security integrations - LDAP etc5
- Docker Image for easy setup5
- Open source5
- Mobile app for android phone, tablet, and tv stick5
- Datacontrol4
- Great development team4
- Free4
- Love it - running on R Pi 22
- Open source server2
- Broadcast & Readonly channels1
- Slack bridge1
- Linux Client Support1
- Flexible Integrations1
- Ldap integration1
- Threading model0
Pros of Total.js Messenger
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of RocketChat
- No full markdown support1
- Mobile app in Enterprise version only1
- Many basic features require plugins1
- Visioconference support is external1
- No screen recorder1
- Few options for user customization1
- Limited message history on SaaS1
- Poor user customization1
- Hard to upgrade1
- Not as well-known as others like it1