RocksDB vs UnQLite

Overview

RocksDB

Stacks141

Followers290

Votes11

GitHub Stars30.9K

Forks6.6K

UnQLite

Stacks6

Followers51

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.3K

Forks174

RocksDB vs UnQLite: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In the world of database management systems, RocksDB and UnQLite are two popular choices, each offering unique features and benefits. Understanding the key differences between these two options can help in making an informed decision based on specific project requirements.

1. **Storage Engine**: RocksDB is a key-value store based on Log-Structured Merge-Tree (LSM) while UnQLite is a document store with a b-tree key-value store. RocksDB utilizes LSM to provide high write throughput and efficient disk space utilization, making it suitable for applications with high write workloads. On the other hand, UnQLite's b-tree structure allows for faster read operations and is ideal for scenarios where read latency is critical.

2. **Language Support**: RocksDB is originally written in C++ but provides bindings for various programming languages such as Java, Python, and Go. In contrast, UnQLite is written in C and provides a native C API, making it more suitable for projects that require direct interaction with C language programs. 

3. **Consistency Model**: RocksDB is optimized for high write throughput and is categorized as an eventually consistent database, meaning it sacrifices some level of consistency for performance. UnQLite, however, follows a strict transaction model with configurable locking mechanisms, ensuring data consistency at the cost of some performance trade-offs.

4. **Memory Management**: RocksDB operates on the principle of memory-mapped files, which can lead to higher memory consumption compared to UnQLite's in-memory storage engine. UnQLite stores data primarily in memory and periodically flushes to disk, making it efficient in terms of memory utilization.

5. **Community Support**: RocksDB is backed by a strong community of developers contributing to its continuous improvement and feature enhancements. UnQLite, while stable and reliable, may have a smaller developer community, leading to potentially slower updates and support for new features or bug fixes.

6. **Scaling Capabilities**: RocksDB is designed to scale horizontally, allowing for distributed deployments across multiple nodes for increased performance and fault tolerance. In contrast, UnQLite's single-node architecture may limit its scalability options for large-scale deployments requiring distributed systems.

In Summary, Understanding the key differences between RocksDB and UnQLite can help in choosing the right database solution based on specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

RocksDB	UnQLite
RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage. RocksDB can also be the foundation for a client-server database but our current focus is on embedded workloads. RocksDB builds on LevelDB to be scalable to run on servers with many CPU cores, to efficiently use fast storage, to support IO-bound, in-memory and write-once workloads, and to be flexible to allow for innovation.	UnQLite is a in-process software library which implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional NoSQL database engine. UnQLite is a document store database similar to MongoDB, Redis, CouchDB etc. as well a standard Key/Value store similar to BerkeleyDB, LevelDB, etc.
Designed for application servers wanting to store up to a few terabytes of data on locally attached Flash drives or in RAM;Optimized for storing small to medium size key-values on fast storage -- flash devices or in-memory;Scales linearly with number of CPUs so that it works well on ARM processors	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 30.9K	GitHub Stars 2.3K
GitHub Forks 6.6K	GitHub Forks 174
Stacks 141	Stacks 6
Followers 290	Followers 51
Votes 11	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Very fast 3 Made by Facebook 2 Consistent performance 1 Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed	Cons 1 Different compilation for each platform

What are some alternatives to RocksDB, UnQLite?

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

RocksDB vs UnQLite: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In the world of database management systems, RocksDB and UnQLite are two popular choices, each offering unique features and benefits. Understanding the key differences between these two options can help in making an informed decision based on specific project requirements.

1. **Storage Engine**: RocksDB is a key-value store based on Log-Structured Merge-Tree (LSM) while UnQLite is a document store with a b-tree key-value store. RocksDB utilizes LSM to provide high write throughput and efficient disk space utilization, making it suitable for applications with high write workloads. On the other hand, UnQLite's b-tree structure allows for faster read operations and is ideal for scenarios where read latency is critical.

2. **Language Support**: RocksDB is originally written in C++ but provides bindings for various programming languages such as Java, Python, and Go. In contrast, UnQLite is written in C and provides a native C API, making it more suitable for projects that require direct interaction with C language programs. 

3. **Consistency Model**: RocksDB is optimized for high write throughput and is categorized as an eventually consistent database, meaning it sacrifices some level of consistency for performance. UnQLite, however, follows a strict transaction model with configurable locking mechanisms, ensuring data consistency at the cost of some performance trade-offs.

4. **Memory Management**: RocksDB operates on the principle of memory-mapped files, which can lead to higher memory consumption compared to UnQLite's in-memory storage engine. UnQLite stores data primarily in memory and periodically flushes to disk, making it efficient in terms of memory utilization.

5. **Community Support**: RocksDB is backed by a strong community of developers contributing to its continuous improvement and feature enhancements. UnQLite, while stable and reliable, may have a smaller developer community, leading to potentially slower updates and support for new features or bug fixes.

6. **Scaling Capabilities**: RocksDB is designed to scale horizontally, allowing for distributed deployments across multiple nodes for increased performance and fault tolerance. In contrast, UnQLite's single-node architecture may limit its scalability options for large-scale deployments requiring distributed systems.

In Summary, Understanding the key differences between RocksDB and UnQLite can help in choosing the right database solution based on specific project requirements.

RocksDB vs UnQLite

Overview