RSA NetWitness vs Splunk

Overview

Splunk

Stacks773

Followers1.0K

Votes20

RSA NetWitness

Stacks4

Followers9

Votes0

RSA NetWitness vs Splunk: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In today's digital landscape, the ability to analyze and detect security threats is essential for organizations to safeguard their data. Two popular security information and event management (SIEM) solutions in the market are RSA NetWitness and Splunk. While both these platforms offer comprehensive security analytics, there are several key differences between them in terms of their architecture, deployment options, and integrated functionalities.

Architecture: RSA NetWitness is known for its network-focused architecture, which allows for real-time monitoring and detection of threats across a wide range of network devices. It employs Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) to capture and analyze network traffic at all layers, enabling it to provide detailed insights into potential security incidents. In contrast, Splunk follows a more flexible architecture that allows users to ingest and analyze data from various sources, not limited to just network traffic. This allows organizations to gain a more holistic view of their security posture by analyzing data from different systems and applications.
Deployment Options: RSA NetWitness primarily offers an on-premises deployment model, where organizations have direct control over their security infrastructure and data. This is suitable for environments where regulatory compliance or strict data privacy requirements necessitate keeping sensitive data within the organization's premises. Splunk, on the other hand, provides more deployment options including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid models. This flexibility allows organizations to choose the deployment option that best aligns with their business needs and resources.
Analytics Capabilities: RSA NetWitness focuses on providing advanced analytics capabilities that leverage machine learning and behavioral analysis to identify and respond to threats proactively. It offers built-in security analytics tools and supports the integration of third-party analytics solutions to enhance detection and response capabilities. Splunk, on the other hand, is renowned for its powerful search capabilities and the ability to create custom dashboards and reports. While it also incorporates machine learning algorithms, Splunk's strength lies in its ability to ingest and correlate vast volumes of data for various use cases beyond just security.
Threat Intelligence Integration: RSA NetWitness has extensive integration with threat intelligence feeds and services, allowing organizations to leverage external threat intelligence data to identify and block known malicious indicators. It supports the integration of various threat feeds and provides automated updates to keep the detection capabilities up to date. In comparison, Splunk has plugins and apps available to integrate with threat intelligence sources, but the level of automation and native integration is not as robust as RSA NetWitness.
Compliance and Reporting: RSA NetWitness offers comprehensive reporting capabilities to help organizations meet compliance requirements and provide evidence of security controls. It provides pre-built compliance reporting templates for standards such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001, making it easier for organizations to generate compliance reports. Splunk also offers reporting functionalities, but it may require additional configurations and customization to meet specific compliance needs.
Community and Ecosystem: Splunk boasts a vibrant community and an extensive ecosystem of apps, integrations, and add-ons. The Splunkbase marketplace offers numerous third-party apps and integrations developed by the community, enabling organizations to enhance the capabilities of their Splunk deployments. RSA NetWitness, while also having a community and partner ecosystem, may not have as extensive a range of third-party offerings compared to Splunk.

In summary, RSA NetWitness is characterized by its network-focused architecture, advanced analytics capabilities, and strong integration with threat intelligence. On the other hand, Splunk offers a more versatile architecture with flexible deployment options, powerful search capabilities, a vibrant community, and a broader range of use cases beyond just security. The choice between the two depends on specific organizational requirements, compliance needs, and the desired breadth of use cases for data analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Splunk	RSA NetWitness
It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.	It brings together evolved SIEM and threat defense solutions that deliver unsurpassed visibility, analytics and automated response capabilities. These combined capabilities help security teams work more efficiently and effectively, up-leveling their threat hunting skills and enabling them to investigate and respond to threats faster, across their organization’s entire infrastructure—whether in the cloud, on premises or virtual.
Predict and prevent problems with one unified monitoring experience; Streamline your entire security stack with Splunk as the nerve center; Detect, investigate and diagnose problems easily with end-to-end observability	Threat defense; Monitoring; Event correlation; Posture assessment; Alert and incident handling
Statistics
Stacks 773	Stacks 4
Followers 1.0K	Followers 9
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Alert system based on custom query results 3 API for searching logs, running reports 2 Ability to style search results into reports 2 Query engine supports joining, aggregation, stats, etc 2 Dashboarding on any log contents Cons 1 Splunk query language rich so lots to learn	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Splunk, RSA NetWitness?

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Related Comparisons

RSA NetWitness vs Splunk: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: RSA NetWitness is known for its network-focused architecture, which allows for real-time monitoring and detection of threats across a wide range of network devices. It employs Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) to capture and analyze network traffic at all layers, enabling it to provide detailed insights into potential security incidents. In contrast, Splunk follows a more flexible architecture that allows users to ingest and analyze data from various sources, not limited to just network traffic. This allows organizations to gain a more holistic view of their security posture by analyzing data from different systems and applications.
Deployment Options: RSA NetWitness primarily offers an on-premises deployment model, where organizations have direct control over their security infrastructure and data. This is suitable for environments where regulatory compliance or strict data privacy requirements necessitate keeping sensitive data within the organization's premises. Splunk, on the other hand, provides more deployment options including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid models. This flexibility allows organizations to choose the deployment option that best aligns with their business needs and resources.
Analytics Capabilities: RSA NetWitness focuses on providing advanced analytics capabilities that leverage machine learning and behavioral analysis to identify and respond to threats proactively. It offers built-in security analytics tools and supports the integration of third-party analytics solutions to enhance detection and response capabilities. Splunk, on the other hand, is renowned for its powerful search capabilities and the ability to create custom dashboards and reports. While it also incorporates machine learning algorithms, Splunk's strength lies in its ability to ingest and correlate vast volumes of data for various use cases beyond just security.
Threat Intelligence Integration: RSA NetWitness has extensive integration with threat intelligence feeds and services, allowing organizations to leverage external threat intelligence data to identify and block known malicious indicators. It supports the integration of various threat feeds and provides automated updates to keep the detection capabilities up to date. In comparison, Splunk has plugins and apps available to integrate with threat intelligence sources, but the level of automation and native integration is not as robust as RSA NetWitness.
Compliance and Reporting: RSA NetWitness offers comprehensive reporting capabilities to help organizations meet compliance requirements and provide evidence of security controls. It provides pre-built compliance reporting templates for standards such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001, making it easier for organizations to generate compliance reports. Splunk also offers reporting functionalities, but it may require additional configurations and customization to meet specific compliance needs.
Community and Ecosystem: Splunk boasts a vibrant community and an extensive ecosystem of apps, integrations, and add-ons. The Splunkbase marketplace offers numerous third-party apps and integrations developed by the community, enabling organizations to enhance the capabilities of their Splunk deployments. RSA NetWitness, while also having a community and partner ecosystem, may not have as extensive a range of third-party offerings compared to Splunk.

RSA NetWitness vs Splunk

Overview