Scaledrone vs Socket.IO

Overview

Socket.IO

Stacks13.6K

Followers11.0K

Votes776

Scaledrone

Stacks4

Followers38

Votes0

Scaledrone vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between Scaledrone and Socket.IO, highlighting the key differences between the two.

Real-time messaging protocol: Scaledrone uses WebSockets as its main real-time messaging protocol, providing low-latency and efficient communication between clients and servers. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a library that supports multiple transport mechanisms, including WebSockets, AJAX long polling, and others. This makes Socket.IO more versatile in terms of supporting different environments and fallback options for real-time communication.
Ease of implementation: Scaledrone simplifies real-time messaging implementation by providing a user-friendly API and easy-to-use SDKs for various programming languages. It aims to get developers up and running quickly with its straightforward implementation process. Socket.IO, although also user-friendly, offers a more extensive list of features and customization options, making it slightly more complex to implement and configure.
Scalability and load balancing: Scaledrone handles the scaling and load balancing of messages automatically, ensuring seamless communication across a distributed system. Its infrastructure takes care of routing messages to the appropriate clients, making it easier to scale the application. On the other hand, Socket.IO relies on the underlying infrastructure and server setup for scalability and load balancing, requiring manual configuration and monitoring.
Browser support: Scaledrone provides support for all modern browsers, including Internet Explorer 11 and above. It ensures a consistent experience across different browser versions. Socket.IO also has extensive browser support, including older versions of Internet Explorer, making it suitable for applications that need to cater to a wider range of browsers.
Community and ecosystem: Socket.IO has a larger and more mature community compared to Scaledrone. This translates to a larger pool of resources, tutorials, and support available for developers. In addition, Socket.IO has been around for a longer time and has a well-established ecosystem of plugins and integrations that can enhance its functionality.
Pricing: Scaledrone offers pricing based on the number of active connections, providing a straightforward and transparent cost structure. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is an open-source library that is free to use, but additional costs might arise if hosting and scaling requirements demand additional infrastructure resources.

In summary, Scaledrone provides a simplified real-time messaging solution with automatic scaling and a user-friendly API, while Socket.IO offers a more versatile and feature-rich library with extensive community support and a wide range of transport mechanisms. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the application and the level of customization desired.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Socket.IO, Scaledrone

Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Node.js

ExpressJS

React

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M

Comments

Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Socket.IO	Scaledrone
It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.	We take care of complex realtime infrastructure problems so you can focus on what you enjoy - building awesome apps.
Real-time analytics - Push data to clients that gets represented as real-time counters, charts or logs.;Binary streaming - Starting in 1.0, it's possible to send any blob back and forth: image, audio, video.;Instant messaging and chat - Socket.IO's "Hello world" is a chat app in just a few lines of code.;Document collaboration - Allow users to concurrently edit a document and see each other's changes.	Send live data to your users; Use it with any programming language; Integrate with both web and mobile apps; Free to use for up to 20 concurrent users and 100k daily events; Accessible pricing; Super easy to get started; Responsive and knowledgable support;
Statistics
Stacks 13.6K	Stacks 4
Followers 11.0K	Followers 38
Votes 776	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 219 Real-time 143 Node.js 141 Event-based communication 102 WebSockets 102 Open source Cons 12 Bad documentation 4 Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated 3 Doesn't work on React Native 2 Websocket Errors 2 Small community	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Auth0 Gatsby Flutter React Backbone.js Cloud Firestore Outbrain	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Socket.IO, Scaledrone?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Scaledrone vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between Scaledrone and Socket.IO, highlighting the key differences between the two.

Real-time messaging protocol: Scaledrone uses WebSockets as its main real-time messaging protocol, providing low-latency and efficient communication between clients and servers. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a library that supports multiple transport mechanisms, including WebSockets, AJAX long polling, and others. This makes Socket.IO more versatile in terms of supporting different environments and fallback options for real-time communication.
Ease of implementation: Scaledrone simplifies real-time messaging implementation by providing a user-friendly API and easy-to-use SDKs for various programming languages. It aims to get developers up and running quickly with its straightforward implementation process. Socket.IO, although also user-friendly, offers a more extensive list of features and customization options, making it slightly more complex to implement and configure.
Scalability and load balancing: Scaledrone handles the scaling and load balancing of messages automatically, ensuring seamless communication across a distributed system. Its infrastructure takes care of routing messages to the appropriate clients, making it easier to scale the application. On the other hand, Socket.IO relies on the underlying infrastructure and server setup for scalability and load balancing, requiring manual configuration and monitoring.
Browser support: Scaledrone provides support for all modern browsers, including Internet Explorer 11 and above. It ensures a consistent experience across different browser versions. Socket.IO also has extensive browser support, including older versions of Internet Explorer, making it suitable for applications that need to cater to a wider range of browsers.
Community and ecosystem: Socket.IO has a larger and more mature community compared to Scaledrone. This translates to a larger pool of resources, tutorials, and support available for developers. In addition, Socket.IO has been around for a longer time and has a well-established ecosystem of plugins and integrations that can enhance its functionality.
Pricing: Scaledrone offers pricing based on the number of active connections, providing a straightforward and transparent cost structure. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is an open-source library that is free to use, but additional costs might arise if hosting and scaling requirements demand additional infrastructure resources.

Scaledrone vs Socket.IO

Overview

Scaledrone vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?