Stan vs scikit-learn

Overview

scikit-learn

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.1K

Votes45

GitHub Stars63.9K

Forks26.4K

Stan

Stacks72

Followers27

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks379

Stan vs scikit-learn: What are the differences?

Stan and scikit-learn are both popular libraries used for statistical modeling and machine learning in Python. However, they have key differences in terms of their functionalities and capabilities.

Modeling Approach: Stan is a probabilistic programming language that allows for specifying complex Bayesian models using a flexible language. On the other hand, scikit-learn follows a more traditional machine learning approach with a focus on supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms, making it more suitable for simpler predictive modeling tasks.
Model Flexibility: Stan provides greater flexibility in model specification due to its probabilistic programming capabilities, allowing for the incorporation of prior knowledge and uncertainty in the model. In contrast, scikit-learn offers a more rigid framework with predefined algorithms and pipelines, limiting the flexibility of model building.
Model Inference: Stan uses Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) for posterior inference, which can be more computationally intensive but provides more accurate results for complex models. Scikit-learn, on the other hand, relies on optimization-based algorithms like gradient descent for model fitting, which may not be as effective for Bayesian modeling.
Model Interpretability: Stan offers better model interpretability through the direct specification of probabilistic models, allowing users to understand the underlying processes and assumptions more clearly. In comparison, scikit-learn focuses more on predictive performance, providing less insight into the inner workings of the models.
Community Support: Scikit-learn has a larger user base and community support, making it easier to find tutorials, documentation, and examples for common machine learning tasks. Stan, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller user community, leading to potentially fewer resources and support for users.
Domain Applications: Stan is commonly used in academic and research settings for complex statistical modeling and Bayesian inference. In contrast, scikit-learn is more widely used in industry for practical machine learning applications due to its ease of use and efficient implementations of popular algorithms.

In Summary, Stan and scikit-learn differ in their modeling approach, flexibility, inference methods, interpretability, community support, and domain applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

scikit-learn	Stan
scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.	A state-of-the-art platform for statistical modeling and high-performance statistical computation. Used for statistical modeling, data analysis, and prediction in the social, biological, and physical sciences, engineering, and business.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 63.9K	GitHub Stars 2.7K
GitHub Forks 26.4K	GitHub Forks 379
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 72
Followers 1.1K	Followers 27
Votes 45	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 26 Scientific computing 19 Easy Cons 2 Limited	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Python Julia R Language Linux MATLAB GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to scikit-learn, Stan?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Stan vs scikit-learn: What are the differences?

Stan and scikit-learn are both popular libraries used for statistical modeling and machine learning in Python. However, they have key differences in terms of their functionalities and capabilities.

Modeling Approach: Stan is a probabilistic programming language that allows for specifying complex Bayesian models using a flexible language. On the other hand, scikit-learn follows a more traditional machine learning approach with a focus on supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms, making it more suitable for simpler predictive modeling tasks.
Model Flexibility: Stan provides greater flexibility in model specification due to its probabilistic programming capabilities, allowing for the incorporation of prior knowledge and uncertainty in the model. In contrast, scikit-learn offers a more rigid framework with predefined algorithms and pipelines, limiting the flexibility of model building.
Model Inference: Stan uses Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) for posterior inference, which can be more computationally intensive but provides more accurate results for complex models. Scikit-learn, on the other hand, relies on optimization-based algorithms like gradient descent for model fitting, which may not be as effective for Bayesian modeling.
Model Interpretability: Stan offers better model interpretability through the direct specification of probabilistic models, allowing users to understand the underlying processes and assumptions more clearly. In comparison, scikit-learn focuses more on predictive performance, providing less insight into the inner workings of the models.
Community Support: Scikit-learn has a larger user base and community support, making it easier to find tutorials, documentation, and examples for common machine learning tasks. Stan, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller user community, leading to potentially fewer resources and support for users.
Domain Applications: Stan is commonly used in academic and research settings for complex statistical modeling and Bayesian inference. In contrast, scikit-learn is more widely used in industry for practical machine learning applications due to its ease of use and efficient implementations of popular algorithms.

In Summary, Stan and scikit-learn differ in their modeling approach, flexibility, inference methods, interpretability, community support, and domain applications.