StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Selenium vs TestComplete

Selenium vs TestComplete

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
TestComplete
TestComplete
Stacks39
Followers60
Votes0

Selenium vs TestComplete: What are the differences?

Introduction

Selenium and TestComplete are both popular automated testing tools used for web application testing. While they share a common goal of automating the testing process, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Browser Support: Selenium supports a wide range of web browsers, including Google Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Safari, and Opera. On the other hand, TestComplete supports only a limited set of browsers, including Internet Explorer and some versions of Chrome and Firefox.

  2. Programming Languages: Selenium provides support for multiple programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript. TestComplete, on the other hand, primarily supports JavaScript but also provides limited support for other languages like C#, VBScript, and DelphiScript.

  3. Object Recognition: Selenium relies on using properties like IDs, class names, CSS selectors, and XPath to locate and interact with elements on a web page. TestComplete, on the other hand, uses a combination of properties and visual recognition to identify and interact with objects.

  4. Platform Support: Selenium supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it highly versatile. TestComplete, however, primarily supports the Windows platform, with limited support for desktop and mobile applications on other platforms.

  5. Integration with IDEs: Selenium can be easily integrated with popular integrated development environments (IDEs) like Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and Visual Studio. TestComplete has its own integrated development environment with features specifically designed for test automation.

  6. License Model: Selenium is an open-source tool released under the Apache 2.0 license, allowing users to modify and distribute it freely. TestComplete, on the other hand, is a commercial tool that requires a paid license for full functionality.

In summary, Selenium offers wider browser support, multiple programming language support, and platform versatility, while TestComplete provides object recognition through visual recognition and its own integrated development environment. Selenium is an open-source tool, while TestComplete is a commercial tool.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, TestComplete

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
TestComplete
TestComplete

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

-
Building Automated UI Tests; Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence; HTML5 Test Automation; Data-Driven Testing; Automated Test Reporting & Analysis
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
39
Followers
12.6K
Followers
60
Votes
527
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

What are some alternatives to Selenium, TestComplete?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana