StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Caching
  4. Web Cache
  5. Squid vs Traefik

Squid vs Traefik

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Squid
Squid
Stacks101
Followers205
Votes17
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks594
Traefik
Traefik
Stacks965
Followers1.2K
Votes93

Squid vs Traefik: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Squid and Traefik

Squid and Traefik are both popular proxy servers, but they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Functionality: Squid primarily functions as a forward proxy server, caching and forwarding client requests to resources on the internet. It is often used for web caching and content filtering. On the other hand, Traefik is a modern reverse proxy and load balancer that is designed for dynamic container environments like Kubernetes. It can automatically route and load balance incoming requests to different containers based on flexible configuration.

  2. Configuration: Squid uses a configuration file that needs to be manually edited with the necessary directives and settings. It requires a deeper understanding of the configuration syntax and options. Traefik, on the other hand, provides an easy-to-use and dynamic configuration based on labels and annotations. It integrates seamlessly with container orchestrators, allowing for automatic discovery and configuration of endpoints.

  3. Scalability: Squid is a more traditional proxy server that is often deployed in a standalone manner. It may require additional infrastructure and configuration for scalability, such as load balancing multiple Squid instances. Traefik is designed to work in containerized environments and is inherently scalable. It can handle the increasing load by dynamically routing traffic to additional containers or nodes as needed.

  4. TLS Termination: Squid supports TLS/SSL handshake termination, allowing it to offload the encryption/decryption process. This can improve performance and reduce the load on backend servers. Traefik also supports TLS termination but offers more advanced features, such as automatic certificate generation with Let's Encrypt, for simplified management of HTTPS connections.

  5. Dynamic Configuration: Squid's configuration is static and requires manual updates for any changes in the network or infrastructure. Traefik, on the other hand, dynamically updates its configuration based on the changes in the container environment. It can automatically discover new containers, remove unhealthy ones, and adjust routing accordingly, making it more adaptable and flexible.

  6. Load Balancing: While Squid can perform load balancing to some extent, it is not its primary focus. Traefik, however, is designed to handle load balancing as one of its core functions. It uses sophisticated algorithms to distribute incoming requests across multiple containers or nodes, improving performance and ensuring high availability.

In Summary, Squid is a versatile forward proxy server mainly used for web caching and content filtering. Traefik, on the other hand, is a modern reverse proxy and load balancer that excels in dynamic container environments, with features like automatic configuration, scalability, and advanced load balancing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Squid
Squid
Traefik
Traefik

Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

-
Continuously updates its configuration (No restarts!); Supports multiple load balancing algorithms; Provides HTTPS to your microservices by leveraging Let's Encrypt (wildcard certificates support); Circuit breakers, retry; High Availability with cluster mode; See the magic through its clean web UI; Websocket, HTTP/2, GRPC ready; Provides metrics; Keeps access logs; Fast; Exposes a Rest API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
594
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
101
Stacks
965
Followers
205
Followers
1.2K
Votes
17
Votes
93
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to config
  • 2
    Cluster
  • 2
    Web application accelerator
  • 2
    Very Fast
  • 1
    High-performance
Pros
  • 20
    Kubernetes integration
  • 18
    Watch service discovery updates
  • 14
    Letsencrypt support
  • 13
    Swarm integration
  • 12
    Several backends
Cons
  • 7
    Complicated setup
  • 7
    Not very performant (fast)
Integrations
No integrations available
Marathon
Marathon
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
gRPC
gRPC
Let's Encrypt
Let's Encrypt
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Consul
Consul
StatsD
StatsD
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm

What are some alternatives to Squid, Traefik?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Varnish

Varnish

Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

Section

Section

Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Nuster

Nuster

nuster is a high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy.

Envoy

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Hipache

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy is an HTTP programmable proxying library that supports websockets. It is suitable for implementing components such as proxies and load balancers.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana