Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Grav

111
156
+ 1
16
Statamic

61
114
+ 1
28
Add tool

Grav vs Statamic: What are the differences?

Introduction: Grav and Statamic are both flat-file content management systems (CMS) that offer flexibility, easy customization, and fast performance. However, they differ in various aspects that cater to different needs and preferences.

  1. Architecture: Grav is file-based and uses Markdown files for content storage, while Statamic is database-driven and uses YAML and Markdown files. Grav provides more control over the files and structure, whereas Statamic's database approach can offer more advanced functionalities and scalability.

  2. Flexibility: Grav is known for its simplicity and ease of customization, making it ideal for developers who want complete control over their website's design. On the other hand, Statamic offers a structured and opinionated approach with predefined templates, fields, and layouts, making it easier for non-technical users to set up and manage a website.

  3. Pricing model: Grav is an open-source platform with no licensing fees, making it a cost-effective solution for individuals and small businesses. In contrast, Statamic operates on a premium license model, where users need to pay for a license based on the features and support they require.

  4. Community and Support: Grav has a vibrant community of developers and users who actively contribute to plugins, themes, and support resources, providing a rich ecosystem for users to leverage. Statamic, being a commercial platform, offers dedicated support, documentation, and a marketplace for add-ons, ensuring reliable assistance for users.

  5. Learning curve: Grav is praised for its minimal learning curve, allowing users to quickly set up a website and start creating content without much technical expertise. Statamic, with its structured approach and reliance on certain conventions, may require a slightly steeper learning curve for beginners or users unfamiliar with its specific workflow.

Summary: In summary, Grav excels in flexibility and control, ideal for developers seeking customization, while Statamic offers a structured approach, suitable for users looking for a guided website setup experience with advanced functionalities.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Grav
Pros of Statamic
  • 4
    Easy to Update
  • 3
    No Databases
  • 2
    Fast Performance
  • 2
    Extensive Plugins
  • 2
    Strong Security
  • 2
    Full Control over customisation + functionality
  • 1
    Ligth storage use
  • 6
    No database
  • 6
    Version control your content
  • 4
    Surprising flexibility
  • 4
    It is based on Laravel
  • 3
    Easy templating
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Too expensive for personal blog
  • 1
    Self hosting

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Grav
Cons of Statamic
  • 2
    Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)
  • 2
    Not user friendly

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Grav?

It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors.

What is Statamic?

The open source, developer & designer-first, Laravel + Git powered CMS built to make managing websites easy with Git.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Grav?
What companies use Statamic?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Grav?
What tools integrate with Statamic?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Grav and Statamic?
WordPress
The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
Joomla!
Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.
Hugo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
Ghost
Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.
Jekyll
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
See all alternatives