Overview

Typo3

Stacks130

Followers86

Votes50

Statamic

Stacks59

Followers114

Votes28

Statamic vs Typo3: What are the differences?

Statamic and Typo3 are both content management systems (CMS) that are commonly used for website development and management. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them distinct from each other.

Pricing Model: Statamic has a one-time licensing fee, where users pay for the software and can use it indefinitely without any additional charges. On the other hand, Typo3 is an open-source platform and its core CMS software is available for free. However, users may incur costs for hosting, extensions, and customization.
User Interface: Statamic has a user-friendly and intuitive control panel that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a smooth and streamlined experience for content editors and website administrators. In contrast, Typo3 has a more complex user interface with a steeper learning curve. It offers advanced features and customization options, but requires more technical expertise.
Scalability: Typo3 is well known for its scalability and ability to handle large and complex websites with thousands of pages and extensive functionality. It is often the preferred choice for enterprises and large organizations. While Statamic can handle smaller to medium-sized websites effectively, it may face limitations when dealing with extensive content and high traffic volumes.
Template System: Statamic uses a simple and flexible template system that is based on the Laravel framework. It provides users with the ability to create and customize templates using a combination of HTML, CSS, and YAML syntax. On the other hand, Typo3 uses TypoScript, a dedicated scripting language, for template creation and configuration. This offers more advanced options for template customization and control.
Community and Support: Typo3 has a large and active community of developers and users, providing extensive online resources, documentation, and support forums. It is also backed by TYPO3 GmbH, an organization that offers commercial support services. Statamic, although it has a growing community, may have more limited online resources and support options in comparison.
Target Audience: Typo3 caters more towards enterprises, large organizations, and websites with complex requirements. It offers extensive features for multi-language, multi-site, and multi-channel management. On the other hand, Statamic is aimed at smaller to medium-sized websites, agencies, and individual developers who prioritize simplicity, flexibility, and ease of use.

In Summary, Statamic and Typo3 differ in their pricing models, user interfaces, scalability, template systems, community support, and target audience focus. The choice between the two CMS platforms largely depends on the specific needs and requirements of the website project at hand.

🔥 Trending in Platform as a Service on StackShare

WordPress Platform As A Service

A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

42

41.4k

Detailed Comparison

Typo3	Statamic
It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.	The open source, developer & designer-first, Laravel + Git powered CMS built to make managing websites easy with Git.
-	Bring Your Own HTML; Drag & Drop Nav Builder; GraphQL; REST API; CLI Tools; Powered by Laravel; Real Time Collaboration; Revisions; Live Preview; Static Site Generator; Asset Manager; Block-Based Editing; Global Data; Image Editing; Multi-Site; Multi-Lingual; Form Management; Users; White Labeling; Addons; OAuth; SEO One-Click Updater; 40+ Custom Fieldtypes
Statistics
Stacks 130	Stacks 59
Followers 86	Followers 114
Votes 50	Votes 28
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Great Security 6 Enterprise CMS 5 LTS and ELTS 5 Open source 4 Customizable	Pros 6 Version control your content 6 No database 4 It is based on Laravel 4 Surprising flexibility 3 Easy templating Cons 2 Not user friendly
Integrations
No integrations available	Docker Amazon S3 GitHub Laravel

What are some alternatives to Typo3, Statamic?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.