StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Tailwind CSS vs UIkIt

Tailwind CSS vs UIkIt

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

UIkIt
UIkIt
Stacks791
Followers417
Votes262
GitHub Stars18.5K
Forks2.3K
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245

Tailwind CSS vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Introduction

Tailwind CSS and UIkit are both popular front-end frameworks that provide a set of styling and layout utilities to simplify web development. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Utility-first vs Component-based: The core philosophy of Tailwind CSS is "utility-first," meaning that it provides a wide range of low-level utility classes that can be combined to build custom designs. On the other hand, UIkit is more "component-based," offering ready-to-use UI components that can be easily customized. This fundamental difference in approach gives developers more flexibility with Tailwind CSS but simplifies the development process with UIkit.

  2. Customization vs Out-of-the-box: Tailwind CSS allows for extensive customization, with a rich set of configuration options that enable developers to personalize every aspect of the framework. In contrast, UIkit provides a consistent and polished design out of the box, making it suitable for projects that require a quick setup and a standardized look.

  3. File Size and Performance: Tailwind CSS typically generates larger file sizes due to its extensive utility classes. While this may have a minor impact on performance, the benefits of a highly flexible and customizable framework outweigh the small increase in file size. UIkit, being component-based, tends to produce smaller file sizes, resulting in faster performance.

  4. Learning Curve: Tailwind CSS has a steeper learning curve as developers need to familiarize themselves with the utility classes and understand how they can be combined to achieve the desired design. In contrast, UIkit's component-based approach simplifies the learning process, as developers can quickly grasp the purpose and usage of each pre-built component.

  5. Community Support: Tailwind CSS has gained a significant following and has a vibrant community of users, contributing to its growing ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and resources. UIkit also has a supportive community but may not have the same level of extensive resources and plugins available for Tailwind CSS.

  6. Design Styling: Tailwind CSS is known for its minimalistic and utility-driven design aesthetic, allowing developers to create unique and custom designs. UIkit, with its out-of-the-box components and styles, has a more polished and cohesive look, making it easier to achieve a consistent design throughout the project without extensive customization.

In Summary, Tailwind CSS offers a utility-first approach with extensive customization options, a larger learning curve, and a minimalistic design aesthetic. UIkit, on the other hand, adopts a component-based approach, provides a polished out-of-the-box design, and has a smaller learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on UIkIt, Tailwind CSS

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt
UIkIt
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.
No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
791
Stacks
4.8K
Followers
417
Followers
3.1K
Votes
262
Votes
245
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Complete GUI
  • 29
    Easy modify
  • 27
    Practical
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 24
    Functional
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, Tailwind CSS?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Vuetify

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase