StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. TeamCity vs Webpack

TeamCity vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K

TeamCity vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will explore the key differences between TeamCity and Webpack. Both TeamCity and Webpack are widely used in the software development industry, but they serve different purposes and offer distinct features. Understanding their differences can help developers make informed decisions about which tool to use in different scenarios.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: TeamCity is a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) server, while Webpack is a module bundler primarily used for managing and optimizing JavaScript dependencies in web applications. TeamCity focuses on automating the build, test, and deployment processes, whereas Webpack focuses on optimizing the application's performance and resource management.

  2. Scalability and Customization: TeamCity is designed to handle large-scale projects and supports distributed build environments, allowing for better resource allocation across multiple build agents. It offers extensive customization options, allowing users to define complex build pipelines and workflows. On the other hand, Webpack is more suitable for small to medium-sized projects and offers less flexibility in terms of customization.

  3. Integration and Ecosystem: TeamCity has a wide range of integrations with popular development tools and technologies, such as Git, GitHub, JIRA, and Docker. It provides robust support for various programming languages and frameworks. Webpack, on the other hand, integrates seamlessly with modern web development frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.js, offering dedicated loaders and plugins for handling specific dependencies and optimizing assets.

  4. Build Time and Performance: TeamCity focuses on the entire CI/CD process, including building, testing, and deploying applications. It optimizes the build time by parallelizing tasks and providing distributed build capabilities. Webpack, on the other hand, primarily focuses on bundling and optimizing JavaScript modules. It offers various optimizations like code splitting, tree shaking, and caching to improve the application's performance and reduce the overall bundle size.

  5. Configuration and Setup: TeamCity requires server-side installation and configuration on a dedicated machine or server. It provides a web-based interface for managing builds and pipelines. Webpack, on the other hand, can be installed directly into the project using npm or yarn. It utilizes a configuration file (webpack.config.js) to define the bundling behavior and other settings, making it easier to version control and share the configuration across teams.

  6. Development Workflow: TeamCity is typically used in conjunction with version control systems like Git or Subversion, where developers push their code to the repository, triggering CI/CD pipelines automatically. It provides a centralized approach for managing the development workflow and collaboration. Webpack, on the other hand, is integrated into the developers' local development environment. It offers features like hot module replacement and live reloading, allowing developers to see the changes immediately without triggering a full build.

In summary, TeamCity is a comprehensive CI/CD server focused on automating the build and deployment processes of large-scale projects, while Webpack is a module bundler designed to optimize JavaScript dependencies and enhance web application performance. TeamCity offers scalability, customization, and integrations with various tools, whereas Webpack provides a lightweight and flexible bundling solution for modern web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TeamCity, Webpack

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Webpack
Webpack

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
45.0K
Followers
1.1K
Followers
28.1K
Votes
316
Votes
752
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    Github integration
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 2
    Proprietary
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
Integrations
Slack
Slack
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Webpack?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana