TestCafe vs TestNG

Overview

TestCafe

Stacks262

Followers273

Votes26

GitHub Stars9.9K

Forks678

TestNG

Stacks1.2K

Followers198

Votes0

TestCafe vs TestNG: What are the differences?

TestCafe and TestNG are both popular testing frameworks used by developers for automated web testing. Although they have similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

1. Architecture: TestCafe is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing framework that runs tests in the browser by injecting its own script into the webpage. It does not require any browser plugins or WebDriver installations. On the other hand, TestNG is a Java-based testing framework that follows a traditional architecture, relying on the WebDriver API to interact with the browser.
2. Language Support: TestCafe supports multiple programming languages including JavaScript, TypeScript, and CoffeeScript. It also provides a concise and easy-to-use API for test automation. In contrast, TestNG is primarily designed for Java and supports other languages through plugins or extensions. It provides a rich set of annotations, assertions, and utilities specifically tailored for Java developers.
3. Parallel Execution: TestCafe natively supports parallel test execution across multiple browsers and machines. It automatically manages browser connections and takes care of synchronization issues. On the other hand, TestNG also supports parallel execution but requires additional configuration and handling of threads and synchronization.
4. Cross-browser Testing: TestCafe provides built-in cross-browser testing capabilities, allowing developers to run tests on multiple browsers without any additional setup. It takes care of browser compatibility issues and automatically adjusts the tests to accommodate different browsers. In contrast, TestNG relies on the WebDriver API for cross-browser testing and requires separate driver configurations for each browser.
5. Reporting: TestCafe offers comprehensive and detailed test reporting out of the box. It generates HTML reports with detailed information about test runs, including screenshots and videos of test execution. TestNG, on the other hand, provides basic reporting features but requires additional plugins or customizations for more advanced reporting.
6. Integration: TestCafe integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, TeamCity, and Travis CI. It provides a command-line interface (CLI) for easy integration into existing workflows. TestNG also integrates well with CI/CD tools and offers plugins for popular build systems like Maven and Gradle.

In Summary, TestCafe is a JavaScript-based testing framework with built-in cross-browser testing and comprehensive reporting, while TestNG is a Java-based framework with a rich set of annotations and support for parallel execution and integration with CI/CD tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestCafe	TestNG
It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.	It is a testing framework designed to simplify a broad range of testing needs, it covers all categories of tests: unit, functional, end-to-end, integration, etc.Run your tests in arbitrarily big thread pools with various policies available (all methods in their own thread, one thread per test class, etc.
Create stable tests (and no manual timeouts); Write in latest JS or TypeScript; Detect JS errors in your code; Launch concurrent tests; Build readable tests with PageObject; Include tests in continuous integration system; Rapid test development	Support for data-driven testing ; Support for parameters; Powerful execution model (no more TestSuite); Supported by a variety of tools and plug-ins (Eclipse, IDEA, Maven, etc
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 678	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 262	Stacks 1.2K
Followers 273	Followers 198
Votes 26	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Cross-browser testing 4 Open source 4 Easy setup/installation 4 Built in waits 3 UI End to End testing Cons 9 No longer free	No community feedback yet
Integrations
TypeScript JavaScript Jenkins Travis CI TeamCity	IntelliJ IDEA Eclipse Apache Maven

What are some alternatives to TestCafe, TestNG?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

TestCafe vs TestNG: What are the differences?

TestCafe and TestNG are both popular testing frameworks used by developers for automated web testing. Although they have similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

1. Architecture: TestCafe is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing framework that runs tests in the browser by injecting its own script into the webpage. It does not require any browser plugins or WebDriver installations. On the other hand, TestNG is a Java-based testing framework that follows a traditional architecture, relying on the WebDriver API to interact with the browser.
2. Language Support: TestCafe supports multiple programming languages including JavaScript, TypeScript, and CoffeeScript. It also provides a concise and easy-to-use API for test automation. In contrast, TestNG is primarily designed for Java and supports other languages through plugins or extensions. It provides a rich set of annotations, assertions, and utilities specifically tailored for Java developers.
3. Parallel Execution: TestCafe natively supports parallel test execution across multiple browsers and machines. It automatically manages browser connections and takes care of synchronization issues. On the other hand, TestNG also supports parallel execution but requires additional configuration and handling of threads and synchronization.
4. Cross-browser Testing: TestCafe provides built-in cross-browser testing capabilities, allowing developers to run tests on multiple browsers without any additional setup. It takes care of browser compatibility issues and automatically adjusts the tests to accommodate different browsers. In contrast, TestNG relies on the WebDriver API for cross-browser testing and requires separate driver configurations for each browser.
5. Reporting: TestCafe offers comprehensive and detailed test reporting out of the box. It generates HTML reports with detailed information about test runs, including screenshots and videos of test execution. TestNG, on the other hand, provides basic reporting features but requires additional plugins or customizations for more advanced reporting.
6. Integration: TestCafe integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, TeamCity, and Travis CI. It provides a command-line interface (CLI) for easy integration into existing workflows. TestNG also integrates well with CI/CD tools and offers plugins for popular build systems like Maven and Gradle.

TestCafe vs TestNG

Overview