Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

TiDB

57
132
+ 1
16
TimescaleDB

176
294
+ 1
41
Add tool

TiDB vs TimescaleDB: What are the differences?

Developers describe TiDB as "A distributed NewSQL database compatible with MySQL protocol". Inspired by the design of Google F1, TiDB supports the best features of both traditional RDBMS and NoSQL. On the other hand, TimescaleDB is detailed as "Scalable time-series database optimized for fast ingest and complex queries. Purpose-built as a PostgreSQL extension". TimescaleDB is the only open-source time-series database that natively supports full-SQL at scale, combining the power, reliability, and ease-of-use of a relational database with the scalability typically seen in NoSQL databases.

TiDB and TimescaleDB belong to "Databases" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by TiDB are:

  • Horizontal scalability
  • Asynchronous schema changes
  • Consistent distributed transactions

On the other hand, TimescaleDB provides the following key features:

  • Packaged as a PostgreSQL extension
  • Full ANSI SQL
  • JOINs (e.g., across PostgreSQL tables)

TiDB and TimescaleDB are both open source tools. It seems that TiDB with 19.6K GitHub stars and 2.85K forks on GitHub has more adoption than TimescaleDB with 7.28K GitHub stars and 385 GitHub forks.

Advice on TiDB and TimescaleDB
Umair Iftikhar
Technical Architect at ERP Studio · | 3 upvotes · 205.8K views
Needs advice
on
TimescaleDBTimescaleDBDruidDruid
and
CassandraCassandra

Developing a solution that collects Telemetry Data from different devices, nearly 1000 devices minimum and maximum 12000. Each device is sending 2 packets in 1 second. This is time-series data, and this data definition and different reports are saved on PostgreSQL. Like Building information, maintenance records, etc. I want to know about the best solution. This data is required for Math and ML to run different algorithms. Also, data is raw without definitions and information stored in PostgreSQL. Initially, I went with TimescaleDB due to PostgreSQL support, but to increase in sites, I started facing many issues with timescale DB in terms of flexibility of storing data.

My major requirement is also the replication of the database for reporting and different purposes. You may also suggest other options other than Druid and Cassandra. But an open source solution is appreciated.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
MongoDBMongoDB

Hi Umair, Did you try MongoDB. We are using MongoDB on a production environment and collecting data from devices like your scenario. We have a MongoDB cluster with three replicas. Data from devices are being written to the master node and real-time dashboard UI is using the secondary nodes for read operations. With this setup write operations are not affected by read operations too.

See more
Needs advice
on
TimescaleDBTimescaleDBMongoDBMongoDB
and
InfluxDBInfluxDB

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

See more
Replies (3)
Yaron Lavi
Recommends
PostgreSQLPostgreSQL

We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale, and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us a We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us better performance by far.

See more
Recommends
DruidDruid

Druid is amazing for this use case and is a cloud-native solution that can be deployed on any cloud infrastructure or on Kubernetes. - Easy to scale horizontally - Column Oriented Database - SQL to query data - Streaming and Batch Ingestion - Native search indexes It has feature to work as TimeSeriesDB, Datawarehouse, and has Time-optimized partitioning.

See more
Ankit Malik
Software Developer at CloudCover · | 3 upvotes · 141.3K views
Recommends
Google BigQueryGoogle BigQuery

if you want to find a serverless solution with capability of a lot of storage and SQL kind of capability then google bigquery is the best solution for that.

See more
Decisions about TiDB and TimescaleDB
Benoit Larroque
Principal Engineer at Sqreen · | 2 upvotes · 74.7K views

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of TiDB
Pros of TimescaleDB
  • 7
    Open source
  • 5
    Horizontal scalability
  • 3
    Strong ACID
  • 1
    HTAP
  • 8
    Open source
  • 7
    Easy Query Language
  • 6
    Time-series data analysis
  • 5
    Established postgresql API and support
  • 4
    Reliable
  • 2
    Postgres integration
  • 2
    Fast and scalable
  • 2
    High-performance
  • 2
    Chunk-based compression
  • 2
    Paid support for automatic Retention Policy
  • 1
    Case studies

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of TiDB
Cons of TimescaleDB
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      Licensing issues when running on managed databases

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is TiDB?

    Inspired by the design of Google F1, TiDB supports the best features of both traditional RDBMS and NoSQL.

    What is TimescaleDB?

    TimescaleDB: An open-source database built for analyzing time-series data with the power and convenience of SQL — on premise, at the edge, or in the cloud.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use TiDB?
    What companies use TimescaleDB?
    See which teams inside your own company are using TiDB or TimescaleDB.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with TiDB?
    What tools integrate with TimescaleDB?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to TiDB and TimescaleDB?
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    CockroachDB
    CockroachDB is distributed SQL database that can be deployed in serverless, dedicated, or on-prem. Elastic scale, multi-active availability for resilience, and low latency performance.
    Cassandra
    Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.
    Vitess
    It is a database solution for deploying, scaling and managing large clusters of MySQL instances. It’s architected to run as effectively in a public or private cloud architecture as it does on dedicated hardware. It combines and extends many important MySQL features with the scalability of a NoSQL database.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    See all alternatives