Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ubuntu vs Yocto: What are the differences?
- Installation Method: Ubuntu is a complete operating system that can be installed on a computer, while Yocto is a tool for building custom Linux distributions from scratch. Ubuntu is installed as a pre-built image, making it more accessible to beginner users, while Yocto requires more technical knowledge to build a customized system.
- Target Audience: Ubuntu is designed for general desktop and server use, providing a user-friendly environment with a wide range of pre-installed applications. In contrast, Yocto is targeted towards embedded systems and IoT devices, allowing for minimalistic and optimized builds tailored to specific hardware requirements.
- Customization Options: Ubuntu provides limited customization options beyond selecting packages during installation, as it comes with a predetermined set of features and applications. On the other hand, Yocto offers extensive customization capabilities, allowing users to tailor their Linux distribution to meet specific project requirements and constraints.
- Community Support: Ubuntu has a large and active community of users and developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums for troubleshooting and assistance. Yocto also has a supportive community, but it is more specialized towards embedded systems development, offering resources specific to custom Linux builds and embedded applications.
- Documentation and Learning Curve: Ubuntu has comprehensive documentation and resources aimed at helping users of all levels navigate the operating system, making it easy for beginners to get started. Yocto, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its complexity and specific focus on custom embedded systems, requiring users to invest time in understanding its tools and workflows.
- Maintenance and Updates: Ubuntu offers regular updates and security patches through its package management system, ensuring the operating system stays up-to-date and secure. Yocto, being a build tool, requires users to actively manage and maintain their custom Linux distribution, applying updates and patches manually to keep the system secure and functional.
In Summary, Ubuntu and Yocto differ in installation method, target audience, customization options, community support, documentation, learning curve, and maintenance and updates.
Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.
Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Ubuntu
- Free to use230
- Easy setup for testing discord bot96
- Gateway Linux Distro57
- Simple interface54
- Don't need driver installation in most cases9
- Open Source6
- Many active communities6
- Software Availability3
- Easy to custom3
- Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu2
- Lightweight container base OS1
- Great OotB Linux Shell Experience1
Pros of Yocto
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ubuntu
- Demanding system requirements5
- Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian4
- Snapd installed by default2
- Systemd1