Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
UltraEdit vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Introduction
UltraEdit and Visual Studio Code are two popular code editors used by developers for writing and editing code. While they both serve the purpose of code editing, there are some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will highlight and discuss the main differences between UltraEdit and Visual Studio Code.
Performance: One of the key differences between UltraEdit and Visual Studio Code is their performance. UltraEdit is known for its fast and efficient performance, especially when working with large files or performing complex operations. On the other hand, while Visual Studio Code is also quite performant, it may experience some lag or slowdown when dealing with exceptionally large files or complex projects.
Customizability: Visual Studio Code offers extensive customization options, allowing users to personalize the editor according to their preferences. Users can install themes, plugins, and extensions to enhance their coding experience. UltraEdit, although it provides some level of customization, does not offer the same level of flexibility and extensibility as Visual Studio Code in terms of supported plugins and extensions.
Platform Compatibility: Visual Studio Code is built using web technologies, making it highly cross-platform compatible. It runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring that developers can use it on different operating systems seamlessly. In contrast, UltraEdit has limited platform support, primarily focusing on Windows operating system. While there is a macOS version available, it may not offer the same feature set as the Windows version.
Price: When it comes to pricing, there is a significant difference between UltraEdit and Visual Studio Code. UltraEdit is a paid software, requiring a license to use, with different pricing tiers for personal and business use. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is free and open-source, making it accessible to developers without any cost.
Language Support: While both UltraEdit and Visual Studio Code support a wide range of programming languages, Visual Studio Code has a more extensive ecosystem and community support. It provides better language support, including features like IntelliSense, code formatting, and debugging for a variety of programming languages. UltraEdit, although offering support for numerous languages, may have limitations in terms of language-specific features and community-developed plugins.
Code Collaboration: Visual Studio Code includes built-in support for real-time code collaboration through its Live Share extension. This allows multiple developers to work simultaneously on the same codebase, making it easier for teams to collaborate and debug code together. UltraEdit does not have built-in code collaboration features, requiring developers to rely on external tools or plugins for collaborative coding.
In summary, UltraEdit and Visual Studio Code differ in terms of performance, customizability, platform compatibility, pricing, language support, and code collaboration features. Depending on individual needs and preferences, developers can choose the one that best suits their requirements.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of UltraEdit
- Performance1
- Resources Use1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of UltraEdit
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1