Undertow vs Websphere Liberty

Overview

Undertow

Stacks49

Followers94

Votes5

Websphere Liberty

Stacks39

Followers93

Votes0

Undertow vs Websphere Liberty: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will be comparing Undertow and Websphere Liberty to highlight their key differences in a concise manner.

Ease of Configuration: Undertow is well-known for its easy configurability with minimal XML files and simple deployment processes, while Websphere Liberty often requires more complex configuration setups and can be more challenging for beginners to navigate.
License Model: Undertow is an open-source web server that is freely available for use, enabling users to modify and customize the server according to their needs. On the other hand, Websphere Liberty follows a commercial license model, which may involve costs based on usage and scalability requirements.
Runtime Performance: Undertow is recognized for its lightweight nature and efficient runtime performance, making it a preferred choice for applications that prioritize speed and low resource consumption. Websphere Liberty, while robust, may have higher resource overhead due to its additional features and enterprise-grade capabilities.
Community Support and Documentation: Undertow benefits from a vibrant open-source community that provides extensive documentation, forums, and resources for users to troubleshoot issues and share best practices. Websphere Liberty, as a commercial offering, may have limited community-driven support and instead relies on IBM's official documentation and customer support channels.
Scalability and Enterprise Features: Websphere Liberty offers a wide range of enterprise-oriented features, such as advanced security options, clustering support, and high availability configurations, making it ideal for large-scale deployments with complex requirements. Undertow, while scalable, may lack some of the intricate features that are essential for enterprise-grade applications.
Compatibility and Ecosystem Integration: Websphere Liberty is designed to seamlessly integrate with other IBM products and technologies, ensuring compatibility and smooth interoperability within the IBM ecosystem. Undertow, while versatile, may require additional customization and integration efforts to work efficiently with certain proprietary platforms or tools.

In Summary, Undertow and Websphere Liberty differ in terms of ease of configuration, license model, runtime performance, community support, enterprise features, and ecosystem integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Undertow	Websphere Liberty
It is a flexible performant web server written in java, providing both blocking and non-blocking API’s based on NIO. It has a composition based architecture that allows you to build a web server by combining small single purpose handlers. The gives you the flexibility to choose between a full Java EE servlet 4.0 container, or a low level non-blocking handler, to anything in between.	It is very lightweight profile of WebSphere Application Server. It is a flexible and dynamic profile of WAS which enables the WAS server to deploy only required custom features instead of deploying a big set of available JEE components.
Flexible Web Server; composition based architecture	lightweight profile; deploy only required custom features
Statistics
Stacks 49	Stacks 39
Followers 94	Followers 93
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Performance 1 Lower footprint Cons 1 Less known 1 Smaller community	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Spring Boot Wildfly	Docker Chef Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Undertow, Websphere Liberty?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Undertow vs Websphere Liberty: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will be comparing Undertow and Websphere Liberty to highlight their key differences in a concise manner.

Ease of Configuration: Undertow is well-known for its easy configurability with minimal XML files and simple deployment processes, while Websphere Liberty often requires more complex configuration setups and can be more challenging for beginners to navigate.
License Model: Undertow is an open-source web server that is freely available for use, enabling users to modify and customize the server according to their needs. On the other hand, Websphere Liberty follows a commercial license model, which may involve costs based on usage and scalability requirements.
Runtime Performance: Undertow is recognized for its lightweight nature and efficient runtime performance, making it a preferred choice for applications that prioritize speed and low resource consumption. Websphere Liberty, while robust, may have higher resource overhead due to its additional features and enterprise-grade capabilities.
Community Support and Documentation: Undertow benefits from a vibrant open-source community that provides extensive documentation, forums, and resources for users to troubleshoot issues and share best practices. Websphere Liberty, as a commercial offering, may have limited community-driven support and instead relies on IBM's official documentation and customer support channels.
Scalability and Enterprise Features: Websphere Liberty offers a wide range of enterprise-oriented features, such as advanced security options, clustering support, and high availability configurations, making it ideal for large-scale deployments with complex requirements. Undertow, while scalable, may lack some of the intricate features that are essential for enterprise-grade applications.
Compatibility and Ecosystem Integration: Websphere Liberty is designed to seamlessly integrate with other IBM products and technologies, ensuring compatibility and smooth interoperability within the IBM ecosystem. Undertow, while versatile, may require additional customization and integration efforts to work efficiently with certain proprietary platforms or tools.

In Summary, Undertow and Websphere Liberty differ in terms of ease of configuration, license model, runtime performance, community support, enterprise features, and ecosystem integration.