StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Vesta vs Webmin

Vesta vs Webmin

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vesta
Vesta
Stacks17
Followers26
Votes0
Webmin
Webmin
Stacks73
Followers163
Votes13
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks727

Vesta vs Webmin: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Vesta and Webmin, highlighting the key differences between the two web hosting control panels.

  1. Installation Process: Vesta uses a single line installation command, making it quick and convenient to set up. On the other hand, Webmin requires a manual installation process, which can be more time-consuming for users.

  2. User Interface: Vesta offers a sleek and modern user interface, featuring a clean design with intuitive navigation. Webmin, on the other hand, has a more traditional and functional interface, which may be preferred by users who prefer simplicity over aesthetics.

  3. Supported Operating Systems: Vesta is specifically designed for Linux systems, making it a solid choice for users who solely utilize Linux for their hosting needs. In contrast, Webmin is compatible with multiple operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, providing flexibility for users with diverse hosting requirements.

  4. Feature Set: Vesta offers a comprehensive set of features, including DNS management, mail server configuration, database management, and more. Webmin, on the other hand, provides a wider range of functionalities, such as network configuration, file system management, and security settings, making it a versatile choice for users looking for an all-in-one control panel solution.

  5. Third-Party Integration: Vesta has limited support for third-party software integration, with a focus on providing in-house solutions for essential functionalities. In contrast, Webmin offers extensive third-party integration capabilities, allowing users to easily integrate various applications, plugins, and modules into their hosting environment.

  6. Community and Support: Vesta has a smaller community compared to Webmin, which translates to a relatively smaller pool of online resources, forums, and active contributors. Webmin, on the other hand, benefits from a larger community and a longer history, providing users with a more extensive support network and a broader range of documentation and troubleshooting solutions.

In summary, Vesta and Webmin differ in their installation process, user interface, supported operating systems, feature set, third-party integration capabilities, and community support. Depending on individual preferences and hosting requirements, users can choose the control panel that best suits their needs.

Detailed Comparison

Vesta
Vesta
Webmin
Webmin

It is an Open Source web hosting control panel with premium features, secure, advanced and minimalistic design.

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Open source; Clean and focused interface without the clutter; Has the latest of very innovative technologies
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
727
Stacks
17
Stacks
73
Followers
26
Followers
163
Votes
0
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Review real-time resources (cpu, mem, stg, proc)
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Virtualmin
  • 1
    DNS Zone Editor
Integrations
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
CentOS
CentOS
Debian
Debian
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
MySQL
MySQL
Fedora
Fedora
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to Vesta, Webmin?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Mina

Mina

Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot