StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. WebSharper vs Zend Framework

WebSharper vs Zend Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Stacks262
Followers215
Votes48
WebSharper
WebSharper
Stacks2
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars617
Forks53

WebSharper vs Zend Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

WebSharper and Zend Framework are two popular web development frameworks that offer various features and functionalities to developers. Despite their similarities in some aspects, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. Architecture: WebSharper is a functional programming framework that leverages F# language and offers a strongly typed environment for web development, while Zend Framework is based on object-oriented programming principles and utilizes PHP language for building web applications.

2. Learning Curve: WebSharper may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with functional programming paradigms, whereas Zend Framework's reliance on PHP makes it more accessible to developers with experience in web development using similar technologies.

3. Community Support: Zend Framework has a larger community of developers and extensive documentation available, making it easier for developers to seek help, share resources, and collaborate on projects. In contrast, WebSharper's community might be smaller, resulting in limited resources and support options.

4. Ecosystem: Zend Framework has a vast ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and libraries that can be easily integrated into web applications, providing developers with a wide range of tools and functionalities. WebSharper, on the other hand, may have a more limited ecosystem due to its niche focus on functional programming.

5. Performance: WebSharper's functional approach can lead to more optimized and efficient code execution, resulting in better performance compared to Zend Framework's object-oriented structure, which may introduce overhead and additional complexity in certain cases.

6. Scalability: Zend Framework's modular architecture and flexible design make it easier to scale web applications by adding new features and functionalities without major restructuring, whereas WebSharper's functional nature may require more careful planning and design considerations for scalability purposes.

In Summary, WebSharper and Zend Framework differ in their architecture, learning curve, community support, ecosystem, performance, and scalability, providing developers with distinct choices based on their preferences and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
WebSharper
WebSharper

It is an open source framework for developing web applications and services using PHP 5.3+. It uses 100% object-oriented code and utilizes most of the new features of namely namespaces, late static binding, lambda functions and closures.

Develop microservices, client-server web applications, reactive SPAs, and more in C# or F#. Bind composite data models to your reactive user interfaces. The flow of reactive values through the code is explicit yet concise, for maximum readability.

Pure object oriented web application framework; Advanced MVC implementation; Supports multi databases including PostgreSQL, SQLite etc; Simple cloud API; Session management; Data encryption; Flexible URI Routing; Zend provides RESTful API development support.
Functional, reactive applications with WebSharper.UI; Model-View-Update architecture with WebSharper.Mvu; Build React components; Web APIs and server-side JSON and HTML; Use powerful language constructs on the client side
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
617
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
53
Stacks
262
Stacks
2
Followers
215
Followers
5
Votes
48
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 25
    Open source
  • 11
    Community
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Many library
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Expressive
Expressive
PHP
PHP
GitHub
GitHub
Webex
Webex
React
React
C#
C#
F#
F#

What are some alternatives to Zend Framework, WebSharper?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase