StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Torus vs XMPP

Torus vs XMPP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

XMPP
XMPP
Stacks71
Followers138
Votes0
Torus
Torus
Stacks3
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks171

Torus vs XMPP: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Torus and XMPP

Torus is a decentralized private key management system that allows users to log in without sharing their passwords with the application, while XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) is a communication protocol for instant messaging and online presence information. 
1. **Decentralization**: Torus operates in a decentralized manner, allowing users to manage their private keys securely, whereas XMPP relies on central servers for message routing.
2. **Authentication**: Torus uses blockchain technology for authentication, enabling secure and seamless login processes, whereas XMPP relies on usernames and passwords, which can be vulnerable to attacks.
3. **Use Cases**: Torus is primarily focused on decentralized identity and authentication solutions for various applications, while XMPP is mainly used for instant messaging and presence information exchange.
4. **Privacy**: Torus emphasizes privacy by design, ensuring that users maintain control over their data and identities, whereas XMPP may have vulnerabilities related to centralized data storage on servers.
5. **Scalability**: Torus offers scalability through its decentralized approach, allowing for easy integration with different applications and platforms, while XMPP may face scalability challenges, especially with a large number of users and concurrent messages.
6. **Adoption and Ecosystem**: Torus is a relatively newer technology with a growing ecosystem, while XMPP has been around for years and has a well-established community supporting its development and usage.

In Summary, Torus and XMPP differ significantly in their approach to authentication, decentralization, use cases, privacy, scalability, and adoption within the technology ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

XMPP
XMPP
Torus
Torus

It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

Torus provides a resource pool and basic file primitives from a set of daemons running atop multiple nodes. These primitives are made consistent by being append-only and coordinated by etcd. From these primitives, a Torus server can support multiple types of volumes, the semantics of which can be broken into subprojects.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
171
Stacks
71
Stacks
3
Followers
138
Followers
5
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Java
Java
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript
etcd
etcd
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to XMPP, Torus?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot