StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Verdaccio vs Yarn

Verdaccio vs Yarn

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Yarn
Yarn
Stacks28.2K
Followers13.5K
Votes151
GitHub Stars41.5K
Forks2.7K
Verdaccio
Verdaccio
Stacks83
Followers47
Votes4
GitHub Stars17.3K
Forks1.4K

Verdaccio vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Introduction

Verdaccio and Yarn are both popular tools used in the JavaScript ecosystem, but they serve different purposes. Verdaccio is a private npm registry that allows users to host their own registry and gain more control over package management. On the other hand, Yarn is a package manager that focuses on performance, reliability, and security in dependency management. Let's explore the key differences between the two:

  1. Architecture: Verdaccio is based on a client-server architecture, where the server acts as a proxy between the npm registry and the clients. It allows users to have their own private packages and cache them locally. In contrast, Yarn is a command-line tool that interacts directly with the npm registry without acting as a separate server. It provides faster and more deterministic dependency resolution compared to npm.

  2. Scalability: While both Verdaccio and Yarn are designed to handle large-scale projects, Verdaccio is particularly suitable for organizations that need a scalable solution. It supports multi-instance clustering, allowing it to handle high traffic loads and ensuring high availability. Yarn, while performant, does not have built-in clustering capabilities like Verdaccio.

  3. Package Publishing: Verdaccio allows users to publish private packages to their private registry, keeping them accessible only to approved users within the organization. This enables better control over package distribution. Yarn, on the other hand, does not provide a private registry feature. It relies on the public npm registry for package publishing.

  4. Authentication: Verdaccio supports multiple authentication strategies, including local authentication, LDAP, and OAuth. This allows organizations to integrate with their existing authentication systems. Yarn does not provide its own authentication mechanism; it relies on the authentication setup of the npm registry it is interacting with.

  5. Package Mirroring: Verdaccio allows users to mirror packages from the public npm registry to their private registry. This reduces the reliance on external networks during the installation and improves the reliability of the project builds. Yarn does not have built-in package mirroring capabilities like Verdaccio.

  6. Community Support: Both Verdaccio and Yarn have active and supportive communities. However, Yarn has a larger community size and more extensive documentation available. This can be beneficial when seeking help or finding resources for troubleshooting.

In summary, while both Verdaccio and Yarn are tools used in JavaScript development, Verdaccio focuses on providing a private npm registry with scalable and customizable features, whereas Yarn aims to enhance package management performance and security without providing its own registry.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Yarn, Verdaccio

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
zen-li
zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

ReviewonYarnYarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Yarn
Yarn
Verdaccio
Verdaccio

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

-
Simple Configuration; Uplinks; Package Access; Authentication; Notifications; Logger; Web User Interface; Open source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
41.5K
GitHub Stars
17.3K
GitHub Forks
2.7K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
28.2K
Stacks
83
Followers
13.5K
Followers
47
Votes
151
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 85
    Incredibly fast
  • 22
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 11
    Can install any npm package
  • 8
    Works where npm fails
Cons
  • 16
    Facebook
  • 7
    Sends data to facebook
  • 4
    Should be installed separately
  • 3
    Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Pros
  • 2
    "Easy to setup"
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    "A lightweight NPM registry"
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
npm
npm
Docker
Docker
Chef
Chef
CircleCI
CircleCI
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
npm
npm
Travis CI
Travis CI
Ansible
Ansible
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
GitLab CI
GitLab CI

What are some alternatives to Yarn, Verdaccio?

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Duo

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Bundler

Bundler

It provides a consistent environment for Ruby projects by tracking and installing the exact gems and versions that are needed. It is an exit from dependency hell, and ensures that the gems you need are present in development, staging, and production.

Browserify-CDN

Browserify-CDN

Browsers don't have the require method defined, but Node.js does. With Browserify you can write code that uses require in the same way that you would use it in Node.

Entropic

Entropic

It is a new package registry with a new CLI, designed to be easy to stand up inside your network. It features an entirely new file-centric API and a content-addressable storage system that attempts to minimize the amount of data you must retrieve over a network. This file-centric approach also applies to the publication API.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana