StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. WCF vs ws

WCF vs ws

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WCF
WCF
Stacks125
Followers107
Votes5
ws
ws
Stacks1.2K
Followers190
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.5K
Forks2.5K

WCF vs ws: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Below are the key differences between WCF and WS.

1. **Protocol Implementation**: WCF supports multiple protocols such as HTTP, TCP, and named pipes, whereas WS primarily uses HTTP protocol for communication.
2. **Flexibility in Messaging**: WCF allows for different types of messages like text, binary, and MTOM, while WS relies on XML for messaging.
3. **Interoperability**: WCF offers better interoperability with non-WCF services due to its support for various protocols and standards, whereas WS may have limitations when interacting with non-WS services.
4. **Error Handling**: WCF provides more advanced error handling capabilities, including fault contracts and detailed exception information, compared to WS.
5. **Configuration Complexity**: WCF configurations can be more complex due to its extensive flexibility in protocol, encoding, and security options, while WS configurations are relatively simpler.
6. **Extensibility**: WCF allows for more extensibility through custom bindings, behaviors, and channels, while WS has fewer extension points available.

In Summary, WCF and WS differ in protocol support, messaging flexibility, interoperability, error handling, configuration complexity, and extensibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

WCF
WCF
ws
ws

It is a framework for building service-oriented applications. Using this, you can send data as asynchronous messages from one service endpoint to another. A service endpoint can be part of a continuously available service hosted by IIS, or it can be a service hosted in an application.

It is a simple to use, blazing fast, and thoroughly tested WebSocket client and server implementation.

-
Simple to use;Blazing fast;WebSocket client and server for Node.js
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
22.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
125
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
107
Followers
190
Votes
5
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Classes
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to WCF, ws?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase