Alternatives to Webix logo

Alternatives to Webix

React, AngularJS, Bootstrap, jQWidgets, and Webex are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Webix.
13
30
+ 1
0

What is Webix and what are its top alternatives?

It is a cross-browser JavaScript UI widgets library. Build fast mobile and desktop web applications that run on all touch devices with HTML5 framework.
Webix is a tool in the Javascript UI Libraries category of a tech stack.
Webix is an open source tool with 367 GitHub stars and 70 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Webix's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Webix

  • React

    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • AngularJS

    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Bootstrap

    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • jQWidgets

    jQWidgets

    It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery. ...

  • Webex

    Webex

    Collaborate with colleagues across your organization, or halfway across the planet. Meet online and share files, information, and expertise. Collaborate from wherever you are with Webex mobile apps for IPhone, iPad, Android, or Blackberry. If you can get online, you can work together. ...

  • Kendo UI

    Kendo UI

    Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution. ...

  • jQuery

    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • Vue.js

    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

Webix alternatives & related posts

React logo

React

114K
91.6K
3.8K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
114K
91.6K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF REACT
  • 760
    Components
  • 652
    Virtual dom
  • 563
    Performance
  • 486
    Simplicity
  • 436
    Composable
  • 175
    Data flow
  • 159
    Declarative
  • 124
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 113
    Reactive updates
  • 111
    Explicit app state
  • 32
    JSX
  • 23
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 19
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 16
    Easy to Use
  • 14
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 10
    Great perfomance
  • 8
    Built by Facebook
  • 7
    Javascript
  • 5
    TypeScript support
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Feels like the 90s
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Easy to start
  • 4
    Awesome
  • 3
    Fancy third party tools
  • 3
    Hooks
  • 3
    Functional
  • 3
    Server side views
  • 3
    Props
  • 2
    Rich ecosystem
  • 2
    Obama
  • 2
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 2
    Has functional components
  • 2
    Simple
  • 2
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 2
    Super easy
  • 2
    Has arrow functions
  • 2
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 2
    SSR
  • 2
    Fast evolving
  • 2
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 2
    Excellent Documentation
  • 2
    Scales super well
  • 2
    Just the View of MVC
  • 2
    Server Side Rendering
  • 2
    Cross-platform
  • 1
    Fragments
  • 1
    Start simple
  • 1
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 1
    Permissively-licensed
  • 1
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 1
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 1
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 1
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 1
    Sharable
CONS OF REACT
  • 35
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 23
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 21
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 8
    JSX
  • 7
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 4
    One-way binding only
  • 2
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 2
    Bad Documentation

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.7M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 26 upvotes · 793.6K views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
AngularJS logo

AngularJS

45.6K
32.9K
5.2K
Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
45.6K
32.9K
+ 1
5.2K
PROS OF ANGULARJS
  • 887
    Quick to develop
  • 587
    Great mvc
  • 571
    Powerful
  • 521
    Restful
  • 503
    Backed by google
  • 348
    Two-way data binding
  • 343
    Javascript
  • 328
    Open source
  • 305
    Dependency injection
  • 197
    Readable
  • 75
    Fast
  • 64
    Directives
  • 63
    Great community
  • 56
    Free
  • 38
    Extend html vocabulary
  • 29
    Components
  • 26
    Easy to test
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 23
    Great documentation
  • 23
    Easy to templates
  • 21
    Easy to start
  • 17
    Light weight
  • 17
    Awesome
  • 14
    Javascript mvw framework
  • 14
    Angular 2.0
  • 13
    Great extensions
  • 13
    Efficient
  • 10
    Easy to prototype with
  • 8
    Coffeescript
  • 8
    High performance
  • 7
    Lots of community modules
  • 7
    Two-way binding
  • 7
    Mvc
  • 6
    Clean and keeps code readable
  • 6
    Easy to e2e
  • 5
    One of the best frameworks
  • 5
    Easy for small applications
  • 4
    Works great with jquery
  • 4
    Fast development
  • 2
    Be a developer, not a plumber.
  • 2
    Hierarchical Data Structure
  • 2
    I do not touch DOM
  • 2
    The two-way Data Binding is awesome
  • 2
    Dart
  • 2
    Typescript
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Declarative programming
  • 1
    Programming fun again
  • 1
    Acoperișul
  • 1
    The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
  • 1
    Fkin awesome
  • 1
    Opinionated in the right areas
  • 1
    Supports api , easy development
  • 1
    Common Place
  • 1
    Great
  • 1
    Very very useful and fast framework for development
  • 1
    Amazing community support
  • 1
    Readable code
  • 1
    Linear learning curve
  • 1
    Scopes
  • 0
    Httpș//Acoperișul 0757604335
  • 0
    Google.com
  • 0
    Bot Ionescu
  • 0
    Angular js
  • 0
    Js
  • 0
    Oautho loc
  • 0
    Shvzjn
  • 0
    Acoperișul 0757604335
CONS OF ANGULARJS
  • 10
    Complex
  • 3
    Dependency injection
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Event Listener Overload
  • 1
    Hard to learn

related AngularJS posts

Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 25 upvotes · 2.1M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 20 upvotes · 815.2K views

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
  • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
  • Jest as testing framework
  • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
  • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
See more
Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

53K
11.9K
7.6K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
53K
11.9K
+ 1
7.6K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 778
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 466
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 411
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 241
    HTML framework
  • 76
    Popular
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 75
    Mobile first
  • 56
    Great grid system
  • 50
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 28
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 14
    Grids
  • 8
    Clean
  • 7
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Love it
  • 3
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Boostrap
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Reactjs
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Easy setup2
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 0
    Frefsd
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 25
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
  • 1
    Super heavy

related Bootstrap posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Module Lead · | 19 upvotes · 2.5M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Francisco Quintero
Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 789.7K views

For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

See more
jQWidgets logo

jQWidgets

8
33
0
HTML5 UI Widgets Framework
8
33
+ 1
0
PROS OF JQWIDGETS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JQWIDGETS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related jQWidgets posts

      Webex logo

      Webex

      150
      216
      19
      Connect with anyone, anywhere, any time
      150
      216
      + 1
      19
      PROS OF WEBEX
      • 6
        Cons
      • 4
        Secure
      • 3
        Good branding - Cisco
      • 3
        High Quality
      • 3
        Easy to Use
      CONS OF WEBEX
      • 1
        Horrible voice quality, voice gaps, drops

      related Webex posts

      Dmitry Mukhin

      Uploadcare is mostly remote team and we're using video conferencing all the time both for internal team meetings and for external sales, support, interview, etc. calls. I think we've tried every solution there is on the market before we've decided to stop with Zoom.

      Tools just plainly don't work (Skype), are painful to install for external participants (Webex and other "enterprise" solutions) can't properly handle 10+ participants calls (Google Hangouts Chat).

      Zoom just works. It has all required features and even handles bad connections very graciously. One of the best tool decisions we've ever made :)

      See more
      Prem Mathew
      Shared insights
      on
      WebexWebexAmazon ChimeAmazon Chime

      I am looking for the best video conferencing software corporate license. Kindly advise on pricing as well as features between Amazon Chime and Webex, which one to choose. What is the best choice for a corporate license?

      See more
      Kendo UI logo

      Kendo UI

      258
      269
      24
      Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset
      258
      269
      + 1
      24
      PROS OF KENDO UI
      • 13
        Collection of controls
      • 4
        Mobile
      • 3
        Multi-framework support
      • 2
        Speed
      • 1
        Built-in router
      • 1
        AngularJS
      CONS OF KENDO UI
      • 4
        Massive footprint
      • 3
        Slow
      • 1
        Poor customizability
      • 1
        Spotty Documentation

      related Kendo UI posts

      Doug Pet
      Shared insights
      on
      Kendo UIKendo UIReactReact

      We are transitioning to develop a web app, and we have selected to use React for our front end. I've looked at Kendo UI as a tool to help out. I am looking for some feedback on the Kendo UI tool and any others that are good. The desktop software that we are replacing has about 150 forms. The app is currently only going to be used inhouse and is connected to SQL server. Thanks in advance!

      See more
      jQuery logo

      jQuery

      168.7K
      50.1K
      6.5K
      The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
      168.7K
      50.1K
      + 1
      6.5K
      PROS OF JQUERY
      • 1.3K
        Cross-browser
      • 957
        Dom manipulation
      • 805
        Power
      • 660
        Open source
      • 610
        Plugins
      • 457
        Easy
      • 395
        Popular
      • 350
        Feature-rich
      • 281
        Html5
      • 227
        Light weight
      • 91
        Simple
      • 84
        Great community
      • 79
        CSS3 Compliant
      • 69
        Mobile friendly
      • 67
        Fast
      • 43
        Intuitive
      • 42
        Swiss Army knife for webdev
      • 35
        Huge Community
      • 10
        Easy to learn
      • 3
        Clean code
      • 2
        Just awesome
      • 2
        Powerful
      • 2
        Nice
      • 2
        Because of Ajax request :)
      • 1
        Easy Setup
      • 1
        Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
      • 1
        It Just Works
      • 1
        Improves productivity
      • 1
        Industry acceptance
      • 1
        Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
      • 1
        Used everywhere
      • 1
        Widely Used
      • 0
        Javascript
      CONS OF JQUERY
      • 5
        Large size
      • 5
        Encourages DOM as primary data source
      • 4
        Sometimes inconsistent API
      • 2
        Live events is overly complex feature

      related jQuery posts

      Kir Shatrov
      Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 20 upvotes · 565.8K views

      The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

      Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

      #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

      See more
      Ganesa Vijayakumar
      Full Stack Coder | Module Lead · | 19 upvotes · 2.5M views

      I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

      I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

      As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

      UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

      Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

      Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

      Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

      Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

      Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

      Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

      Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

      Thanks, Ganesa

      See more
      Vue.js logo

      Vue.js

      38.4K
      30.5K
      1.4K
      A progressive framework for building user interfaces
      38.4K
      30.5K
      + 1
      1.4K
      PROS OF VUE.JS
      • 276
        Simple and easy to start with
      • 217
        Good documentation
      • 186
        Components
      • 123
        Simple the best
      • 95
        Simplified AngularJS
      • 81
        Reactive
      • 69
        Intuitive APIs
      • 48
        Javascript
      • 45
        Changed my front end coding life
      • 40
        Configuration is smooth
      • 28
        Easy to learn
      • 25
        So much fun to use
      • 20
        Progressive
      • 17
        Virtual dom
      • 13
        Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
      • 9
        It's magic
      • 8
        Component is template, javascript and style in one
      • 8
        Best of Both Worlds
      • 7
        Without misleading licenses
      • 7
        Perfomance
      • 7
        Application structure
      • 7
        Elegant design
      • 6
        Intuitive and easy to use
      • 5
        Light Weight
      • 4
        Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
      • 4
        Good command line interface
      • 3
        Small learning curve
      • 3
        Like Angular only quicker to get started with
      • 3
        Customer Render ending eg to HTML
      • 2
        One-way data flow
      • 2
        Single file components
      • 2
        Intuitive
      • 2
        Lots of documentation
      • 2
        Component based
      • 2
        Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
      • 2
        Concise error messages
      • 2
        Logicless templates
      • 2
        Supports several template languages
      • 2
        High performance
      • 1
        GUI
      CONS OF VUE.JS
      • 6
        Less Common Place
      • 3
        YXMLvsHTML Markup
      • 1
        Don't support fragments
      • 1
        Only support programatically multiple root nodes

      related Vue.js posts

      Johnny Bell
      Shared insights
      on
      Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

      I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

      It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

      I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

      See more