StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Bedrock.io vs Laravel

Bedrock.io vs Laravel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.8K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
Bedrock.io
Bedrock.io
Stacks0
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars207
Forks23

Bedrock.io vs Laravel: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Bedrock.io and Laravel, highlighting the key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Dependency Management: Bedrock.io uses a modern approach to dependency management by utilizing Composer to handle package dependencies. On the other hand, Laravel incorporates its own dependency management system called Composer, which simplifies the integration of third-party packages and libraries.

  2. Configuration System: Bedrock.io offers a simplified configuration system, where all the configuration settings are stored in a single .env file. In contrast, Laravel provides a more comprehensive configuration system that allows for granular control and organization of configuration settings through separate files and directories.

  3. Database Support: Bedrock.io primarily focuses on MySQL as the default database, offering straightforward migration and querying capabilities. Laravel, on the other hand, is database-agnostic and supports a wide range of databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server, providing more flexibility and options in choosing the appropriate database for a project.

  4. API Development: Laravel is renowned for its built-in API development capabilities, offering a robust API framework out-of-the-box. Bedrock.io, while it can be used for API development, does not provide the same level of native API support as Laravel, requiring additional customization and integration with other tools or frameworks.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Laravel has a large and active community, resulting in a vast ecosystem of community-driven packages, libraries, and resources. This extensive ecosystem provides developers with numerous ready-to-use solutions and continuous support. Bedrock.io, being a newer and less established framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may limit the availability of pre-built solutions and support.

  6. Learning Curve and Documentation: Laravel offers comprehensive and well-structured documentation, making it relatively easier for developers to learn and understand the framework. Bedrock.io, although it also provides documentation, may have a steeper learning curve due to its relatively newer and less popular status.

In summary, Bedrock.io and Laravel differ in terms of their dependency management approach, configuration system, database support, API development capabilities, community and ecosystem, as well as the learning curve and documentation resources available.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Laravel
Laravel
Bedrock.io
Bedrock.io

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

It is a battle-tested collection of micro services, components and patterns that allow you to rapidly build modern software solutions. It ties together Kubernetes, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, Node.js and React (KEMNR).

Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
Data-Centric; Secure & Compliant; Horizontally Scalable; Modern Stack
Statistics
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
207
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
23
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
0
Followers
23.8K
Followers
1
Votes
3.9K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
React
React
Node.js
Node.js
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
MongoDB
MongoDB
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Bedrock.io?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase