StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Alerta vs Kibana

Alerta vs Kibana

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kibana
Kibana
Stacks20.6K
Followers16.4K
Votes262
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks8.5K
Alerta
Alerta
Stacks26
Followers32
Votes0

Alerta vs Kibana: What are the differences?

Introduction

Alerta and Kibana are two popular tools used in the field of monitoring and visualization of logs and events. While both are designed to handle large amounts of data and provide insights for troubleshooting and analysis, there are some key differences between them.

  1. Alerta: Alerta is an open-source monitoring system that focuses on alert management and visualization. It provides a unified view of alerts from different monitoring tools and allows for easy integration with various notification channels. Alerta offers a flexible and customizable alert filtering and categorization system, allowing users to prioritize and take actions on the most critical alerts. It also supports the creation of custom plugins for extending its functionality.

  2. Kibana: Kibana is an open-source data visualization tool that is part of the Elastic Stack. It is primarily used for exploring, analyzing, and visualizing data stored in Elasticsearch. Kibana provides a user-friendly interface for creating interactive dashboards, visualizations, and charts. It supports various data types and offers powerful querying and filtering capabilities. It also allows for the creation of alerts and notifications based on predefined conditions.

  3. Integration: One major difference between Alerta and Kibana is their integration capabilities. Alerta is designed to integrate with multiple monitoring tools, allowing for the consolidation of alerts from various sources. On the other hand, Kibana is tightly integrated with Elasticsearch, which serves as the data source for visualization and analysis. While Kibana can ingest data from various sources, its primary focus is on Elasticsearch.

  4. Focus: Alerta primarily focuses on alert management and visualization, providing a centralized platform for managing alerts from different sources. It offers features like alert deduplication, escalation, and suppression. On the other hand, Kibana focuses on data exploration, visualization, and analysis. It provides a wide range of tools and options for creating interactive visualizations and dashboards.

  5. Customization: Alerta offers a high level of customization, allowing users to define their own alert rules, filters, and notification channels. It also provides an API for programmatic access and integration with external systems. Kibana, on the other hand, provides a more user-friendly and intuitive interface for visualization and analysis, but it may have limitations in terms of customization and flexibility.

  6. Data Source: Another significant difference lies in their data sources. Alerta can receive alerts from various monitoring tools and systems, including Nagios, Zabbix, Prometheus, and more. It acts as a central aggregator and provides a unified view of all the alerts. Kibana, on the other hand, relies on Elasticsearch as its data source. It is designed to work specifically with Elasticsearch indices and does not have direct integration with other monitoring systems.

In summary, Alerta is a flexible and customizable alert management system with integration capabilities for multiple monitoring tools, while Kibana is a visualization tool tightly integrated with Elasticsearch, focusing on data exploration and analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kibana, Alerta

matteo1989it
matteo1989it

Jun 26, 2019

ReviewonKibanaKibanaGrafanaGrafanaElasticsearchElasticsearch

I use both Kibana and Grafana on my workplace: Kibana for logging and Grafana for monitoring. Since you already work with Elasticsearch, I think Kibana is the safest choice in terms of ease of use and variety of messages it can manage, while Grafana has still (in my opinion) a strong link to metrics

757k views757k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Jun 25, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: “We need better analytics & insights into our Elasticsearch cluster. Grafana, which ships with advanced support for Elasticsearch, looks great but isn’t officially supported/endorsed by Elastic. Kibana, on the other hand, is made and supported by Elastic. I’m wondering what people suggest in this situation."

663k views663k
Comments
abrahamfathman
abrahamfathman

Jun 26, 2019

ReviewonKibanaKibanaSplunkSplunkGrafanaGrafana

I use Kibana because it ships with the ELK stack. I don't find it as powerful as Splunk however it is light years above grepping through log files. We previously used Grafana but found it to be annoying to maintain a separate tool outside of the ELK stack. We were able to get everything we needed from Kibana.

2.29M views2.29M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kibana
Kibana
Alerta
Alerta

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

It combines a JSON API server for receiving, processing and rendering alerts with a simple, yet effective Alerta Web UI and command-line tool.

Flexible analytics and visualization platform;Real-time summary and charting of streaming data;Intuitive interface for a variety of users;Instant sharing and embedding of dashboards
Supports SQL; Flexible alert format; De-duplication and simple correlation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
20.6K
Stacks
26
Followers
16.4K
Followers
32
Votes
262
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 88
    Easy to setup
  • 65
    Free
  • 45
    Can search text
  • 21
    Has pie chart
  • 13
    X-axis is not restricted to timestamp
Cons
  • 7
    Unintuituve
  • 4
    Elasticsearch is huge
  • 4
    Works on top of elastic only
  • 3
    Hardweight UI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Logstash
Logstash
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Beats
Beats
Slack
Slack
Prometheus
Prometheus
New Relic
New Relic
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Nagios
Nagios
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Sensu
Sensu
Zabbix
Zabbix

What are some alternatives to Kibana, Alerta?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana