Amazon S3 vs OpenEBS

Overview

Amazon S3

Stacks55.1K

Followers40.2K

Votes2.0K

OpenEBS

Stacks28

Followers87

Votes40

GitHub Stars9.5K

Forks972

Amazon S3 vs OpenEBS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon S3 and OpenEBS are two storage solutions that serve different purposes in the world of cloud computing. While Amazon S3 is a highly scalable object storage service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), OpenEBS is an open-source container-attached storage platform that enables persistent storage for Kubernetes.

Architecture and Infrastructure: The key difference between Amazon S3 and OpenEBS lies in their architecture and infrastructure. Amazon S3 stores data as objects in a distributed system, where each object is assigned a unique key. On the other hand, OpenEBS leverages the local storage of the Kubernetes nodes to provide persistent block or file storage to containers.
Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Amazon S3 is known for its extreme scalability and ability to handle massive amounts of data. It allows users to store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web. On the other hand, while OpenEBS is designed to be highly scalable within a Kubernetes environment, it may have limitations when used in larger scale deployments.
Data Protection and Durability: Amazon S3 offers various mechanisms for data protection and durability. It automatically creates multiple copies of objects and distributes them across different servers and facilities to ensure high availability and durability. In contrast, OpenEBS relies on the underlying infrastructure's redundancy features, such as RAID, to provide data protection and durability.
Cost Model: Another key difference between Amazon S3 and OpenEBS lies in their cost models. Amazon S3 follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users pay based on their storage consumption, data transfer, and requests for accessing the stored data. OpenEBS, being an open-source solution, is free to use, but users would still need to factor in the costs associated with the underlying infrastructure and storage media.
API Compatibility: Amazon S3 provides a well-defined and widely adopted REST API that allows developers to easily integrate their applications with the storage service. OpenEBS, on the other hand, utilizes the Kubernetes API to offer storage capabilities to applications running on Kubernetes clusters. This difference in API compatibility may affect the ease of integration for certain applications or development frameworks.
Ecosystem and Support: Amazon S3 benefits from being a part of the wider AWS ecosystem, which provides a vast range of complementary services and tools for building cloud-based applications. It also offers comprehensive documentation, support channels, and a large community of users. OpenEBS, being an open-source project, relies on its community for support and may have a narrower ecosystem compared to Amazon S3.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and OpenEBS differ in terms of their architecture, scalability, data protection, cost model, API compatibility, and ecosystem/support. While Amazon S3 excels in scalability and offers extensive support and resources, OpenEBS provides a lightweight and open-source solution tailored for persistent storage in Kubernetes environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, OpenEBS

Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

PHP

Laravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?
DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure
Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.
There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k

Comments

Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k

Comments

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3	OpenEBS
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web	OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.
Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.	Open source; Block Storage; dynamic and static PV/PVC provisioning; CSI Support; raw block devices; snapshots; clones; thin-provisioning; volume grow; volume shrink; multiple file system choices; DR with S3 backup and restore; data persistency across nodes; synchronization of data across cloud availability zones; supported stacks includes OpenShift; Rancher; IBM Cloud Private; Kontena; Kublr; Giant Swarm; Loodse; Docker; Kubernetes; AWS; Azure; Google Cloud; Digital Ocean
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 9.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 972
Stacks 55.1K	Stacks 28
Followers 40.2K	Followers 87
Votes 2.0K	Votes 40
Pros & Cons
Pros 590 Reliable 492 Scalable 456 Cheap 329 Simple & easy 83 Many sdks Cons 7 Permissions take some time to get right 6 Requires a credit card 6 Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly 3 Complex to set up	Pros 7 Great support on Slack 6 Open source 6 Easy to use 5 In user space 5 Container attached storage
Integrations
No integrations available	Grafana Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Prometheus Amazon EC2 Rancher Amazon EKS Helm Azure Kubernetes Service

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, OpenEBS?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs OpenEBS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Architecture and Infrastructure: The key difference between Amazon S3 and OpenEBS lies in their architecture and infrastructure. Amazon S3 stores data as objects in a distributed system, where each object is assigned a unique key. On the other hand, OpenEBS leverages the local storage of the Kubernetes nodes to provide persistent block or file storage to containers.
Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Amazon S3 is known for its extreme scalability and ability to handle massive amounts of data. It allows users to store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web. On the other hand, while OpenEBS is designed to be highly scalable within a Kubernetes environment, it may have limitations when used in larger scale deployments.
Data Protection and Durability: Amazon S3 offers various mechanisms for data protection and durability. It automatically creates multiple copies of objects and distributes them across different servers and facilities to ensure high availability and durability. In contrast, OpenEBS relies on the underlying infrastructure's redundancy features, such as RAID, to provide data protection and durability.
Cost Model: Another key difference between Amazon S3 and OpenEBS lies in their cost models. Amazon S3 follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users pay based on their storage consumption, data transfer, and requests for accessing the stored data. OpenEBS, being an open-source solution, is free to use, but users would still need to factor in the costs associated with the underlying infrastructure and storage media.
API Compatibility: Amazon S3 provides a well-defined and widely adopted REST API that allows developers to easily integrate their applications with the storage service. OpenEBS, on the other hand, utilizes the Kubernetes API to offer storage capabilities to applications running on Kubernetes clusters. This difference in API compatibility may affect the ease of integration for certain applications or development frameworks.
Ecosystem and Support: Amazon S3 benefits from being a part of the wider AWS ecosystem, which provides a vast range of complementary services and tools for building cloud-based applications. It also offers comprehensive documentation, support channels, and a large community of users. OpenEBS, being an open-source project, relies on its community for support and may have a narrower ecosystem compared to Amazon S3.

Amazon S3 vs OpenEBS

Overview