StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Amazon SQS vs MassTransit

Amazon SQS vs MassTransit

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Stacks2.8K
Followers2.0K
Votes171
MassTransit
MassTransit
Stacks167
Followers176
Votes0

Amazon SQS vs MassTransit: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Amazon SQS and MassTransit

Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) and MassTransit are both messaging services used for managing asynchronous communication between distributed systems. Despite their similar functionality, there are key differences that differentiate the two.

1. **Message Delivery**: Amazon SQS ensures that each message is delivered at least once, with the possibility of duplicates. In contrast, MassTransit guarantees the delivery of messages only once, eliminating the risk of duplicate processing.

2. **Ease of Use**: Amazon SQS is a fully managed service that requires minimal setup and maintenance by the user. On the other hand, MassTransit is an open-source library that necessitates more configuration and management on the developer's part.

3. **Scalability**: Amazon SQS is highly scalable and can handle a large volume of messages with ease. MassTransit, while scalable, may require additional configuration and resources to achieve the same level of scalability as Amazon SQS.

4. **Compatibility**: Amazon SQS is platform-agnostic, allowing seamless integration with various programming languages and frameworks. MassTransit, however, is primarily designed for .NET applications, limiting its compatibility with other platforms.

5. **Visibility**: Amazon SQS provides real-time monitoring and visibility into the status of messages through its console and APIs. MassTransit, although it offers monitoring capabilities, may not provide the same level of visibility and control as Amazon SQS.

6. **Cost**: Amazon SQS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of requests and data transfer. Meanwhile, MassTransit is free to use but may incur costs for hosting and managing the underlying infrastructure.

In Summary, Amazon SQS and MassTransit offer distinct advantages in terms of message delivery, ease of use, scalability, compatibility, visibility, and cost, catering to different needs in the realm of messaging services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon SQS, MassTransit

MITHIRIDI
MITHIRIDI

Software Engineer at LightMetrics

May 8, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon SQSAmazon SQSAmazon MQAmazon MQ

I want to schedule a message. Amazon SQS provides a delay of 15 minutes, but I want it in some hours.

Example: Let's say a Message1 is consumed by a consumer A but somehow it failed inside the consumer. I would want to put it in a queue and retry after 4hrs. Can I do this in Amazon MQ? I have seen in some Amazon MQ videos saying scheduling messages can be done. But, I'm not sure how.

303k views303k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
MassTransit
MassTransit

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

It is free software/open-source .NET-based Enterprise Service Bus software that helps Microsoft developers route messages over MSMQ, RabbitMQ, TIBCO and ActiveMQ service busses, with native support for MSMQ and RabbitMQ.

A queue can be created in any region.;The message payload can contain up to 256KB of text in any format. Each 64KB ‘chunk’ of payload is billed as 1 request. For example, a single API call with a 256KB payload will be billed as four requests.;Messages can be sent, received or deleted in batches of up to 10 messages or 256KB. Batches cost the same amount as single messages, meaning SQS can be even more cost effective for customers that use batching.;Long polling reduces extraneous polling to help you minimize cost while receiving new messages as quickly as possible. When your queue is empty, long-poll requests wait up to 20 seconds for the next message to arrive. Long poll requests cost the same amount as regular requests.;Messages can be retained in queues for up to 14 days.;Messages can be sent and read simultaneously.;Developers can get started with Amazon SQS by using only five APIs: CreateQueue, SendMessage, ReceiveMessage, ChangeMessageVisibility, and DeleteMessage. Additional APIs are available to provide advanced functionality.
Message-based communication; Reliable; Scalable
Statistics
Stacks
2.8K
Stacks
167
Followers
2.0K
Followers
176
Votes
171
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Easy to use, reliable
  • 40
    Low cost
  • 28
    Simple
  • 14
    Doesn't need to maintain it
  • 8
    It is Serverless
Cons
  • 2
    Has a max message size (currently 256K)
  • 2
    Difficult to configure
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 1
    Has a maximum 15 minutes of delayed messages only
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET
Server Density
Server Density
PHP
PHP
Datadog
Datadog
Tutum
Tutum

What are some alternatives to Amazon SQS, MassTransit?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

IronMQ

IronMQ

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase