StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Vue CLI vs anime.js

Vue CLI vs anime.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue CLI
Vue CLI
Stacks433
Followers471
Votes3
GitHub Stars29.7K
Forks6.3K
anime.js
anime.js
Stacks44
Followers67
Votes0
GitHub Stars65.1K
Forks4.4K

Vue CLI vs anime.js: What are the differences?

  1. Project Structure: Vue CLI provides a predefined project structure with templates, plugins, and integrated tools, making it easier for developers to start building Vue.js applications, while anime.js focuses on animation capabilities, allowing for more creative freedom and control over animations.
  2. Build Process: Vue CLI simplifies the build process with integrated webpack configurations, hot-reload, and optimized production builds, whereas in anime.js, the focus is on creating complex animations without the need for a build process.
  3. Componentization: Vue CLI promotes component-based architecture, enabling developers to create reusable and modular components, which can enhance code maintainability and scalability, whereas anime.js does not enforce a component-based structure as it primarily focuses on animation effects.
  4. Template Syntax: Vue CLI leverages Vue's template syntax for data binding and event handling, providing a declarative approach to building interactive interfaces, whereas anime.js uses a JavaScript-based API for creating animations, offering more flexibility and control over the animation process.
  5. Community Support: Vue CLI benefits from a large and active community of Vue.js developers, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins, while anime.js, although popular, may have a smaller community focused specifically on animation-related discussions and support.
  6. Learning Curve: Vue CLI may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its comprehensive features and configurations, whereas anime.js is relatively easier to grasp, especially for those familiar with JavaScript and animation concepts.

In Summary, Vue CLI focuses on providing a structured environment for building Vue.js applications with enhanced development features, while anime.js specializes in creating advanced and customized animations with a more flexible and JavaScript-centric approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vue CLI
Vue CLI
anime.js
anime.js

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

It is a lightweight JavaScript animation library with a simple, yet powerful API. It works with CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes and JavaScript Objects.

Feature Rich - Out-of-the-box support for Babel, TypeScript, ESLint, PostCSS, PWA, Unit Testing & End-to-end Testing.; Extensible; No Need to Eject;Graphical User Interface;Instant Prototyping;Future Ready
Layered CSS transforms; Controls and callbacks;Animate anything
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.7K
GitHub Stars
65.1K
GitHub Forks
6.3K
GitHub Forks
4.4K
Stacks
433
Stacks
44
Followers
471
Followers
67
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    GUI for installing dependencies
  • 1
    Detects and run npm tasks
  • 1
    Visual Web Interface
No community feedback yet
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
Babel
Babel
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
ESLint
ESLint
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
JavaScript
JavaScript
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Vue CLI, anime.js?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase