Alternatives to Apigility logo

Alternatives to Apigility

Slim, Lumen, Laravel, API Platform, and Postman are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Apigility.
30
39
+ 1
2

What is Apigility and what are its top alternatives?

An API-based architecture is essential to agile delivery of mobile applications. Apigility provides JSON representations that can be parsed and used in any mobile framework; write for the web or native applications simultaneously!
Apigility is a tool in the API Tools category of a tech stack.
Apigility is an open source tool with 474 GitHub stars and 144 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Apigility's open source repository on GitHub

Apigility alternatives & related posts

related Slim posts

Y. Taborda
Y. Taborda
Full Stack Developer · | 1 upvotes · 43.9K views
PHP
PHP
Lumen
Lumen
Yii
Yii
Slim
Slim

I'm about to start a new project to build a REST API, and I got to this point: Yii2 Vs Lumen Vs Slim, I used Yii 1.1 a while a go and it was awesome, really easy to work with, as a developer you don't have to worry about almost anything, just setup the framework, get your php extensions, and start coding your app.

But, I was told about performance and someone recomended Lumen or Slim to work with a micro framework and a less bloated framework, what worries me is the lack of advantages that Yii2 offers, ACF and RBAC as a native tool on the framework, gii, the model validations and all the security props already in it.

Is it worth it? Is the performance so great on those frameworks to leave aside the advantages of a framework like Yii2?

How do you suggest to make the test to prove wich one is better?

PHP Lumen Yii Slim

See more
Lumen logo

Lumen

219
188
85
219
188
+ 1
85
The stunningly fast PHP micro-framework by Laravel
Lumen logo
Lumen
VS
Apigility logo
Apigility

related Lumen posts

Tassanai Singprom
Tassanai Singprom
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP
HTML5
HTML5
jQuery
jQuery
Redis
Redis
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Sass
Sass
Vue.js
Vue.js
Firebase
Firebase
Laravel
Laravel
Lumen
Lumen
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
GraphQL
GraphQL
MariaDB
MariaDB
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
Postman
Postman
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Git
Git
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
npm
npm
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Kibana
Kibana
Sentry
Sentry
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Slack
Slack

This is my stack in Application & Data

JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

My Utilities Tools

Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

My Devops Tools

Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

My Business Tools

Slack

See more
Y. Taborda
Y. Taborda
Full Stack Developer · | 1 upvotes · 43.9K views
PHP
PHP
Lumen
Lumen
Yii
Yii
Slim
Slim

I'm about to start a new project to build a REST API, and I got to this point: Yii2 Vs Lumen Vs Slim, I used Yii 1.1 a while a go and it was awesome, really easy to work with, as a developer you don't have to worry about almost anything, just setup the framework, get your php extensions, and start coding your app.

But, I was told about performance and someone recomended Lumen or Slim to work with a micro framework and a less bloated framework, what worries me is the lack of advantages that Yii2 offers, ACF and RBAC as a native tool on the framework, gii, the model validations and all the security props already in it.

Is it worth it? Is the performance so great on those frameworks to leave aside the advantages of a framework like Yii2?

How do you suggest to make the test to prove wich one is better?

PHP Lumen Yii Slim

See more

related Laravel posts

Antonio Sanchez
Antonio Sanchez
CEO at Kokoen GmbH · | 12 upvotes · 104.2K views
atKokoen GmbHKokoen GmbH
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
MySQL
MySQL
Go
Go
MongoDB
MongoDB
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
ExpressJS
ExpressJS

Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

See more
Epistol
Epistol
Laravel
Laravel
PhpStorm
PhpStorm
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
Sass
Sass
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Vue.js
Vue.js
Webpack
Webpack
Buddy
Buddy
nginx
nginx
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Deployer
Deployer
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Let's Encrypt
Let's Encrypt
Stripe
Stripe
Asana
Asana
Bulma
Bulma
PHP
PHP
#CDG
CDG

I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

See more
API Platform logo

API Platform

17
6
0
17
6
+ 1
0
REST and GraphQL framework to build modern API-first projects
    Be the first to leave a pro
    API Platform logo
    API Platform
    VS
    Apigility logo
    Apigility

    related Postman posts

    Noah Zoschke
    Noah Zoschke
    Engineering Manager at Segment · | 29 upvotes · 211.2K views
    atSegmentSegment
    Postman
    Postman
    Markdown
    Markdown
    ReadMe.io
    ReadMe.io
    Swagger UI
    Swagger UI
    #Documentation
    #Api
    #QA

    We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

    Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

    Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

    This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

    Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

    Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

    Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

    See more
    Nicholas Rogoff
    Nicholas Rogoff
    at Avanade UK Ltd. · | 7 upvotes · 106.8K views
    atNHS Digital (NHS.UK)NHS Digital (NHS.UK)
    .NET Core
    .NET Core
    C#
    C#
    Microsoft SQL Server
    Microsoft SQL Server
    JavaScript
    JavaScript
    jQuery
    jQuery
    Git
    Git
    Azure DevOps
    Azure DevOps
    Postman
    Postman
    Newman
    Newman
    Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio
    Visual Studio

    Secure Membership Web API backed by SQL Server. This is the backing API to store additional profile and complex membership metadata outside of an Azure AD B2C provider. The front-end using the Azure AD B2C to allow 3rd party trusted identity providers to authenticate. This API provides a way to add and manage more complex permission structures than can easily be maintained in Azure AD.

    We have .Net developers and an Azure infrastructure environment using server-less functions, logic apps and SaaS where ever possible. For this service I opted to keep it as a classic WebAPI project and deployed to AppService.

    • Trusted Authentication Provider: @AzureActiveDirectoryB2C
    • Frameworks: .NET Core
    • Language: C# , Microsoft SQL Server , JavaScript
    • IDEs: Visual Studio Code , Visual Studio
    • Libraries: jQuery @EntityFramework, @AutoMapper, @FeatureToggle , @Swashbuckle
    • Database: @SqlAzure
    • Source Control: Git
    • Build and Release Pipelines: Azure DevOps
    • Test tools: Postman , Newman
    • Test framework: @nUnit, @moq
    • Infrastructure: @AzureAppService, @AzureAPIManagement
    See more
    Amazon API Gateway logo

    Amazon API Gateway

    577
    298
    25
    577
    298
    + 1
    25
    Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale
    Amazon API Gateway logo
    Amazon API Gateway
    VS
    Apigility logo
    Apigility

    related Insomnia REST Client posts

    Jason Barry
    Jason Barry
    Cofounder at FeaturePeek · | 4 upvotes · 57.3K views
    atFeaturePeekFeaturePeek
    Insomnia REST Client
    Insomnia REST Client
    Postman
    Postman
    Paw
    Paw
    Dropbox
    Dropbox

    We've tried a couple REST clients over the years, and Insomnia REST Client has won us over the most. Here's what we like about it compared to other contenders in this category:

    • Uncluttered UI. Things are only in your face when you need them, and the app is visually organized in an intuitive manner.
    • Native Mac app. We wanted the look and feel to be on par with other apps in our OS rather than a web app / Electron app (cough Postman).
    • Easy team sync. Other apps have this too, but Insomnia's model best sets the "set and forget" mentality. Syncs are near instant and I'm always assured that I'm working on the latest version of API endpoints. Apps like Paw use a git-based approach to revision history, but I think this actually over-complicates the sync feature. For ensuring I'm always working on the latest version of something, I'd rather have the sync model be closer to Dropbox's than git's, and Insomnia is closer to Dropbox in that regard.

    Some features like automatic public-facing documentation aren't supported, but we currently don't have any public APIs, so this didn't matter to us.

    See more

    related Paw posts

    Jason Barry
    Jason Barry
    Cofounder at FeaturePeek · | 4 upvotes · 57.3K views
    atFeaturePeekFeaturePeek
    Insomnia REST Client
    Insomnia REST Client
    Postman
    Postman
    Paw
    Paw
    Dropbox
    Dropbox

    We've tried a couple REST clients over the years, and Insomnia REST Client has won us over the most. Here's what we like about it compared to other contenders in this category:

    • Uncluttered UI. Things are only in your face when you need them, and the app is visually organized in an intuitive manner.
    • Native Mac app. We wanted the look and feel to be on par with other apps in our OS rather than a web app / Electron app (cough Postman).
    • Easy team sync. Other apps have this too, but Insomnia's model best sets the "set and forget" mentality. Syncs are near instant and I'm always assured that I'm working on the latest version of API endpoints. Apps like Paw use a git-based approach to revision history, but I think this actually over-complicates the sync feature. For ensuring I'm always working on the latest version of something, I'd rather have the sync model be closer to Dropbox's than git's, and Insomnia is closer to Dropbox in that regard.

    Some features like automatic public-facing documentation aren't supported, but we currently don't have any public APIs, so this didn't matter to us.

    See more
    RAML logo

    RAML

    78
    95
    35
    78
    95
    + 1
    35
    RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing
    RAML logo
    RAML
    VS
    Apigility logo
    Apigility
    Charles logo

    Charles

    72
    45
    0
    72
    45
    + 1
    0
    HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
      Be the first to leave a pro
      Charles logo
      Charles
      VS
      Apigility logo
      Apigility
      Retrofit logo

      Retrofit

      69
      24
      0
      69
      24
      + 1
      0
      A type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java
        Be the first to leave a pro
        Retrofit logo
        Retrofit
        VS
        Apigility logo
        Apigility
        OpenAPI Specification logo

        OpenAPI Specification

        68
        25
        2
        68
        25
        + 1
        2
        An API description format for REST APIs
        OpenAPI Specification logo
        OpenAPI Specification
        VS
        Apigility logo
        Apigility
        Soap UI logo

        Soap UI

        65
        15
        0
        65
        15
        + 1
        0
        An open source SOAP and REST API testing tool
          Be the first to leave a pro
          Soap UI logo
          Soap UI
          VS
          Apigility logo
          Apigility
          JSON Server logo

          JSON Server

          58
          70
          3
          58
          70
          + 1
          3
          Get a full fake REST API with zero coding in less than 30 seconds. For front-end developers who...
          JSON Server logo
          JSON Server
          VS
          Apigility logo
          Apigility
          API Blueprint logo

          API Blueprint

          58
          40
          2
          58
          40
          + 1
          2
          A powerful high-level API design language for web APIs
          API Blueprint logo
          API Blueprint
          VS
          Apigility logo
          Apigility