StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Low Code Platforms
  5. Appsmith vs Blazor

Appsmith vs Blazor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Blazor
Blazor
Stacks549
Followers724
Votes445
Appsmith
Appsmith
Stacks57
Followers117
Votes0
GitHub Stars38.4K
Forks4.3K

Appsmith vs Blazor: What are the differences?

Introduction

Appsmith and Blazor are both tools that developers can use to build web applications. However, they have some key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore these differences and highlight the specific features of each tool.

  1. Language Appsmith is built with a combination of JavaScript and React, while Blazor is built with C# and Razor syntax. This means that developers familiar with JavaScript and React will find it easier to work with Appsmith, while those experienced with C# will prefer Blazor.

  2. Server-Side vs. Client-Side Rendering One of the main differences between Appsmith and Blazor is the way they handle rendering. Appsmith relies on client-side rendering, which means that the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code is executed on the client's browser. On the other hand, Blazor uses server-side rendering, where the rendering is done on the server and the final result is sent to the client's browser. This difference in rendering approach can have implications for application performance and responsiveness.

  3. Integration with Backend Technologies Appsmith provides built-in integration with various backend technologies like databases and APIs. It offers pre-built widgets and APIs for common use cases, allowing developers to easily connect their frontend application to the backend. In contrast, Blazor requires developers to manually write code to integrate with backend technologies. While this gives developers more control and flexibility, it also requires more effort and time.

  4. Deployment Appsmith applications can be deployed on various platforms, including cloud platforms like AWS and Heroku, as well as on-premises servers. The deployment process is simplified and can be done with a few clicks. On the other hand, Blazor applications can be deployed as static websites, Azure Web Apps, or as part of a .NET Core application. The deployment process for Blazor applications may require more configuration and setup compared to Appsmith.

  5. Community and Ecosystem Appsmith has a growing community and ecosystem, with a marketplace for widgets and plugins that developers can use to enhance their applications. It also has a rich set of documentation and tutorials to help developers get started. In comparison, Blazor has a larger community and ecosystem, thanks to its association with the .NET ecosystem. There are more resources, libraries, and tools available for Blazor, making it easier for developers to find solutions and get support.

  6. Platform Compatibility Appsmith is a web-based tool that can be used on any operating system that supports a modern web browser. This includes Windows, macOS, and Linux. Blazor, on the other hand, is part of the .NET ecosystem, which means it is primarily targeted towards Windows operating systems. While there are ways to run Blazor applications on other operating systems, the level of support and compatibility may vary.

In summary, Appsmith and Blazor differ in terms of the programming language used, rendering approach, integration with backend technologies, deployment options, community and ecosystem, and platform compatibility. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and cater to different developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Blazor
Blazor
Appsmith
Appsmith

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Open source framework to build, deploy and share internal apps. Use UI widgets like tables, charts, forms, maps, and more. Easily connect to DBs like Postgres, Mongo, MySQL++ or REST API/GraphQL and use JS anywhere.

Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming
Deploy Appsmith on your servers in 5 minutes; Drag & drop, resize and style widgets without HTML / CSS; Query & update your database directly from the UI. Connect to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, MySQL, REST & GraphQL APIs; Write snippets of business logic using JS to transform data, manipulate UI or trigger workflows. Use popular libraries like lodash & moment anywhere in the app; Simple configuration to create flows when users interact with the UI; Changes in your application reflect instantly with every edit. No need to compile; Connect directly to any PostgreSQL, MySQL & MongoDB; Control who can edit / view your applications from a single control panel; Build and organise multiple applications on a single platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
38.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
549
Stacks
57
Followers
724
Followers
117
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 63
    Uses C#
  • 49
    No need to learn separate language or technology
  • 42
    Supports making a single page application
  • 40
    Tight integration with .NET project
  • 38
    Uses .NET standard library
Cons
  • 4
    Initial load time
  • 2
    Hard to inject javascript
No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET
.NET
C#
C#
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
SMTP
SMTP
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Shopify
Shopify
ArangoDB
ArangoDB
Fauna
Fauna
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
cURL
cURL
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
MySQL
MySQL
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Blazor, Appsmith?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Stamplay

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase