Alternatives to Aqueduct logo

Alternatives to Aqueduct

Django, ExpressJS, Flask, Django REST framework, and Sinatra are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Aqueduct.
17
43
+ 1
9

What is Aqueduct and what are its top alternatives?

Aqueduct is an open source, server-side web framework written in Google’s Dart language. Aqueduct promises faster development, experimentation and testing – without sacrificing power.
Aqueduct is a tool in the Microframeworks (Backend) category of a tech stack.
Aqueduct is an open source tool with 2.4K GitHub stars and 248 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Aqueduct's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Aqueduct

  • Django

    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • ExpressJS

    ExpressJS

    Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications. ...

  • Flask

    Flask

    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind. ...

  • Django REST framework

    Django REST framework

    It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

  • Sinatra

    Sinatra

    Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort. ...

  • Koa

    Koa

    Koa aims to be a smaller, more expressive, and more robust foundation for web applications and APIs. Through leveraging generators Koa allows you to ditch callbacks and greatly increase error-handling. Koa does not bundle any middleware. ...

  • hapi

    hapi

    hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services. ...

  • Lumen

    Lumen

    Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching. ...

Aqueduct alternatives & related posts

Django logo

Django

26.6K
23.4K
3.8K
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
26.6K
23.4K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF DJANGO
  • 634
    Rapid development
  • 468
    Open source
  • 401
    Great community
  • 353
    Easy to learn
  • 263
    Mvc
  • 215
    Beautiful code
  • 210
    Elegant
  • 193
    Free
  • 191
    Great packages
  • 178
    Great libraries
  • 68
    Restful
  • 65
    Comes with auth and crud admin panel
  • 65
    Powerful
  • 60
    Great documentation
  • 58
    Great for web
  • 44
    Python
  • 37
    Great orm
  • 34
    Great for api
  • 27
    All included
  • 22
    Web Apps
  • 21
    Fast
  • 18
    Used by top startups
  • 16
    Clean
  • 15
    Easy setup
  • 15
    Sexy
  • 12
    Convention over configuration
  • 10
    ORM
  • 9
    The Django community
  • 9
    Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
  • 6
    Great MVC and templating engine
  • 6
    King of backend world
  • 6
    Its elegant and practical
  • 5
    Mvt
  • 5
    Batteries included
  • 5
    Full stack
  • 5
    Fast prototyping
  • 5
    Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
  • 5
    Easy to develop end to end AI Models
  • 5
    Have not found anything that it can't do
  • 4
    Very quick to get something up and running
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Cross-Platform
  • 3
    Map
  • 3
    Great peformance
  • 3
    Scaffold
  • 3
    Just the right level of abstraction
  • 3
    Modular
  • 3
    Full-Text Search
  • 3
    Zero code burden to change databases
  • 3
    Python community
  • 3
    Many libraries
  • 2
    Easy to change database manager
  • 1
    Node js
CONS OF DJANGO
  • 25
    Underpowered templating
  • 19
    Underpowered ORM
  • 19
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
  • 7
    Admin
  • 7
    Not nodejs
  • 6
    Configuration hell
  • 4
    Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
  • 3
    Python
  • 3
    Not typed
  • 3
    Bloated admin panel included
  • 2
    Overwhelming folder structure
  • 1
    InEffective Multithreading

related Django posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

See more

Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

See more
ExpressJS logo

ExpressJS

21K
15.9K
1.5K
Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple
21K
15.9K
+ 1
1.5K
PROS OF EXPRESSJS
  • 367
    Simple
  • 322
    Node.js
  • 235
    Javascript
  • 185
    High performance
  • 148
    Robust routing
  • 66
    Middlewares
  • 66
    Open source
  • 53
    Great community
  • 34
    Hybrid web applications
  • 10
    Well documented
  • 8
    Sinatra inspired
  • 5
    Isomorphic js.. superfast and easy
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 2
    Socket connection
  • 2
    Npm
  • 2
    Event loop
  • 2
    Light weight
  • 2
    Resource available for learning
  • 2
    Xxx
  • 1
    Callbacks
  • 1
    Data stream
CONS OF EXPRESSJS
  • 23
    Not python
  • 16
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 6
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 2
    Easily Insecure for Novices
  • 1
    Not a lion
  • 1
    Nnnn

related ExpressJS posts

Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 25 upvotes · 2.1M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more

Repost

Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

See more
Flask logo

Flask

14.1K
11.8K
1.5K
A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
14.1K
11.8K
+ 1
1.5K
PROS OF FLASK
  • 313
    Lightweight
  • 269
    Python
  • 214
    Minimal
  • 145
    Open source
  • 98
    Documentation
  • 66
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Easy to setup and get it going
  • 53
    Well designed
  • 48
    Easy to develop and maintain applications
  • 45
    Easy to get started
  • 18
    Beautiful code
  • 16
    Rapid development
  • 14
    Powerful
  • 13
    Expressive
  • 12
    Awesome
  • 11
    Love it
  • 11
    Flexibilty
  • 11
    Speed
  • 10
    Get started quickly
  • 10
    Simple to use
  • 10
    Easy to integrate
  • 9
    Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
  • 9
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Customizable
  • 8
    Productive
  • 8
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    Flask
  • 6
    Not JS
  • 6
    User friendly
  • 5
    Secured
  • 4
    Unopinionated
  • 1
    Secure
  • 1
    Orm
CONS OF FLASK
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 4
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring

related Flask posts

James Man
Software Engineer at Pinterest · | 42 upvotes · 844.8K views
Shared insights
on
FlaskFlaskReactReact
at

One of our top priorities at Pinterest is fostering a safe and trustworthy experience for all Pinners. As Pinterest’s user base and ads business grow, the review volume has been increasing exponentially, and more content types require moderation support. To solve greater engineering and operational challenges at scale, we needed a highly-reliable and performant system to detect, report, evaluate, and act on abusive content and users and so we created Pinqueue.

Pinqueue-3.0 serves as a generic platform for content moderation and human labeling. Under the hood, Pinqueue3.0 is a Flask + React app powered by Pinterest’s very own Gestalt UI framework. On the backend, Pinqueue3.0 heavily relies on PinLater, a Pinterest-built reliable asynchronous job execution system, to handle the requests for enqueueing and action-taking. Using PinLater has significantly strengthened Pinqueue3.0’s overall infra with its capability of processing a massive load of events with configurable retry policies.

Hundreds of millions of people around the world use Pinterest to discover and do what they love, and our job is to protect them from abusive and harmful content. We’re committed to providing an inspirational yet safe experience to all Pinners. Solving trust & safety problems is a joint effort requiring expertise across multiple domains. Pinqueue3.0 not only plays a critical role in responsively taking down unsafe content, it also has become an enabler for future ML/automation initiatives by providing high-quality human labels. Going forward, we will continue to improve the review experience, measure review quality and collaborate with our machine learning teams to solve content moderation beyond manual reviews at an even larger scale.

See more

Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

See more
Django REST framework logo

Django REST framework

1.6K
1.7K
301
Web APIs for Django
1.6K
1.7K
+ 1
301
PROS OF DJANGO REST FRAMEWORK
  • 64
    Browsable api
  • 64
    Easy to use
  • 53
    Great documentation
  • 49
    Customizable
  • 41
    Fast development
  • 9
    Easy to use, customizable, pluggable, serializer
  • 8
    Python
  • 5
    Django ORM
  • 4
    FastSerialize
  • 2
    Less code
  • 2
    Easy implementation
  • 0
    Dsasda
CONS OF DJANGO REST FRAMEWORK
  • 2
    Bad documentation
  • 2
    Reimplements Django functionality
  • 1
    No support for URL Namespaces
  • 0
    Bad CSRF handling

related Django REST framework posts

Tim Abbott

Zulip has been powered by Django since the very early days of its development with Django 1.4, back in 2012. As a reasonably mature web application with significant scale, we're at the stage in many companies' development where one starts to rip out more and more of the web framework to optimize things or just make them work the way we want. (E.g. while I was at Dropbox in early 2016, we discovered we only had about 600 lines of code left from the original Pylons framework that actually ran).

One of the things that has been really fantastic about Django is that we're still happily using it for the vast majority of code in the project, and every time Django comes out with a new release, I read the changelog and get excited about several improvements that actually make my life better. While Django has made some design decisions that I don't agree with (e.g. I'm not a fan of Django REST framework, and think it makes life more difficult), Django also makes it easy to do your own thing, which we've done to great effect (see the linked article for details on our has_request_variables framework).

Overall I think we've gotten a ton of value out of Python and Django and would recommend it to anyone starting a new full-featured web application project today.

See more

Hi

I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

I would love your insights on where I should go.

See more
Sinatra logo

Sinatra

628
457
212
Classy web-development dressed in a DSL
628
457
+ 1
212
PROS OF SINATRA
  • 65
    Lightweight
  • 50
    Simple
  • 35
    Open source
  • 20
    Ruby
  • 13
    Great ecosystem of tools
  • 10
    Ease of use
  • 8
    If you know http you know sinatra
  • 5
    Large Community
  • 5
    Fast
  • 1
    Flexibilty and easy to use
CONS OF SINATRA
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Sinatra posts

    Koa logo

    Koa

    498
    400
    11
    Next generation web framework for node.js
    498
    400
    + 1
    11
    PROS OF KOA
    • 5
      Async/Await
    • 5
      JavaScript
    • 1
      REST API
    CONS OF KOA
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Koa posts

      Antonio Kobashikawa
      Web developer | Blogger | Freelancer at Rulo Kobashikawa · | 6 upvotes · 179K views

      We are using Node.js and ExpressJS to build a REST services that is middleware of a legacy system. MongoDB as database. Vue.js helps us to make rapid UI to test use cases. Frontend is build for mobile with Ionic . We like using JavaScript and ES6 .

      I think next step could be to use Koa but I am not sure.

      See more
      Paul Whittemore
      Developer and Owner at Appurist Software · | 1 upvote · 144.9K views
      Shared insights
      on
      FastifyFastifyKoaKoaExpressJSExpressJS

      Will base most server-side APIs on Fastify . Smaller, faster, easier. Faster than Koa; and twice as fast as ExpressJS.

      See more
      hapi logo

      hapi

      392
      393
      85
      Server Framework for Node.js
      392
      393
      + 1
      85
      PROS OF HAPI
      • 25
        Makes me Hapi making REST APIs
      • 14
        Simpler than other REST libraries
      • 14
        Configuration
      • 13
        Quality Driven Ecosystem
      • 13
        Modularization
      • 5
        Easy testability
      • 1
        Better validation
      • 0
        Restify
      CONS OF HAPI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related hapi posts

        What is the best way to increase your income as a freelancer in 2019? What frameworks should be the best to learn? React Node.js Docker Kubernetes Sequelize Mongoose MongoDB ExpressJS hapi Based on trends I've picked up a JS full stack. If you need to work under startups you may replace React with Vue.js . If you want to work in outsourcing Angular 2+ may be better.

        What is your opinion?

        See more
        Lumen logo

        Lumen

        375
        562
        152
        The stunningly fast PHP micro-framework by Laravel
        375
        562
        + 1
        152
        PROS OF LUMEN
        • 33
          API
        • 25
          Microframework
        • 19
          MVC
        • 16
          PHP
        • 12
          Open source
        • 11
          Eloquent
        • 10
          Restful & fast framework
        • 7
          Illuminate support
        • 7
          Composer
        • 4
          Brother of laravel and fast
        • 4
          Easy to learn
        • 4
          Fast
        CONS OF LUMEN
        • 3
          Not fast
        • 2
          PHP
        • 1
          Not fast with MongoDB

        related Lumen posts

        Tassanai Singprom

        This is my stack in Application & Data

        JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

        My Utilities Tools

        Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

        My Devops Tools

        Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

        My Business Tools

        Slack

        See more
        Aimad Quouninich

        Hello everyone,

        I have a final-study project, and I'm responsible for making decisions for what frameworks to use (both front-end and back-end) and the software architecture to adapt.

        The project is a web application for a concrete company. The main goal is to calculate what is called OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness), meaning simply the efficiency of the machine. The calculation and display of OEE will be in real-time, meaning that this rate will be updated every two minutes, and it will appear in a graph. Also, we have the state of the machines to display whether the machines are working just fine or there is some problem.

        This will be done using IoT, meaning that important data will be sent from the machine to the web application that I will create via the API (someone else will be responsible for this matter). Of course, the application will include employees, factories, as well as machines, ... etc.

        The most important thing in the application is real-time performance monitoring of machines and the OEE.

        A real example of what we want to do => https://evocon.com/

        I choose to use Laravel because : - This type of applications could be implemented by Laravel - Me and my colleague have some knowledge and practice with this framework (choosing other technologies like Node.js means a huge learning curve) - Easy documentation and abandon tutorials

        The only reason why I choose Vue.js because It goes well with Laravel (from what I have learned).

        The second important question, which software architecture should I adapt ? should I use Microservice Architecture or the normal and well-known Monolithic Architecture? I know the benefits and disadvantages of the first and second methods, but I do not want to make a wrong decision.

        If I choose microservice for this project, I will use Lumen (PHP Micro-Framework By Laravel).

        Should I use micro-frontend as well? Like VuMS, or it's not necessary for this project?

        I don't think that the reasons to choose Laravel are enough, so I want to understand the obstacles that I may face during the development.

        In the end, I decided to ask and take expert opinions.

        NOTE: this web application will be used by other companies, like in the case of evocon.

        If there are tips and things that I must know to accomplish this project, please mention them.

        Thank you very much.

        See more