StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Autify vs LambdaTest

Autify vs LambdaTest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Stacks556
Followers198
Votes204
Autify
Autify
Stacks12
Followers13
Votes13

Autify vs LambdaTest: What are the differences?

Introduction

This comparison explores key differences between Autify and LambdaTest for making an informed decision on test automation tools.

  1. Focus on Automation Type: Autify primarily specializes in no-code automation testing, making it ideal for users without coding expertise. In contrast, LambdaTest offers a wider range of testing capabilities, including both code-based and no-code options, catering to diverse user needs.

  2. Integration Capabilities: LambdaTest supports integration with various third-party tools and platforms, allowing users to seamlessly incorporate it into their existing workflow. On the other hand, Autify offers limited integrations, which may restrict its compatibility with certain tools or systems.

  3. Cross-Browser Testing: LambdaTest excels in cross-browser testing, enabling users to test their applications on a wide array of browsers and devices for comprehensive validation. While Autify also supports cross-browser testing, its range of browsers and devices may be more limited compared to LambdaTest.

  4. Execution Flexibility: Autify provides the flexibility to execute tests both in the cloud and on local machines, offering users the freedom to choose based on their specific requirements. LambdaTest, on the other hand, primarily operates in the cloud, which may limit execution options for some users.

  5. Reporting and Analytics: LambdaTest offers robust reporting and analytics features, providing users with detailed insights into their test results and performance metrics. While Autify also includes reporting capabilities, the depth and customization options may not be as extensive as those offered by LambdaTest.

  6. Scalability and Pricing: LambdaTest offers scalable pricing plans based on the user's requirements, making it suitable for both individuals and enterprises. In comparison, Autify's pricing structure may be less flexible, potentially posing challenges for users with varying testing needs.

In Summary, when choosing between Autify and LambdaTest, consider factors such as automation type, integration capabilities, cross-browser testing, execution flexibility, reporting features, and scalability & pricing to determine the best fit for your testing requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Autify
Autify

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.

Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;
No Coding Required; Maintenance by AI; Record a Test Scenario, Cross Browser Testing
Statistics
Stacks
556
Stacks
12
Followers
198
Followers
13
Votes
204
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
Cons
  • 1
    Limited device support
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Works flexibly for an SPA
  • 3
    Cross browser testing
  • 3
    Simplify
Integrations
Zoho Bugtracker
Zoho Bugtracker
GitLab
GitLab
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
RSpec
RSpec
Jira
Jira
PractiTest
PractiTest
AngularJS
AngularJS
JUnit
JUnit
TestCafe
TestCafe
Appium
Appium
Slack
Slack
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Testrail
Testrail

What are some alternatives to LambdaTest, Autify?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana