StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. AWS App2Container vs Docker Compose

AWS App2Container vs Docker Compose

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
AWS App2Container
AWS App2Container
Stacks3
Followers18
Votes0

AWS App2Container vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Use Case**: AWS App2Container is specifically designed to analyze and containerize existing applications to run on AWS services, while Docker Compose is a tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications.
2. **Integration with AWS Services**: App2Container seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS, enabling easy deployment on AWS infrastructure, whereas Docker Compose is more generic and can be used with any container orchestrator.
3. **Migration Effort**: App2Container automates the containerization process by analyzing the application dependencies and configurations, reducing migration effort, whereas Docker Compose requires more manual configuration and setup for containerizing applications.
4. **Scalability**: AWS App2Container is well-suited for scaling applications on AWS cloud infrastructure due to its seamless integration with AWS services, while Docker Compose is better suited for smaller-scale deployments or testing environments.
5. **Support and Maintenance**: AWS App2Container is supported by AWS with regular updates and maintenance, ensuring compatibility with AWS services, while Docker Compose relies on the open-source community for support and updates.
6. **Monitoring and Logging**: App2Container provides integrations with AWS monitoring and logging services, facilitating better visibility and management of containerized applications, whereas Docker Compose may require additional tools or configurations for monitoring and logging.

In Summary, AWS App2Container and Docker Compose differ in their specific use cases, integration with AWS services, automation capabilities, scalability options, support structures, and monitoring/logging features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
AWS App2Container
AWS App2Container

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

It analyzes and builds an inventory of all applications running in virtual machines, on-premises or in the cloud. You simply select the application you want to containerize, and it packages the application artifact and identified dependencies into container images, configures the network ports, and generates the ECS task and Kubernetes pod definitions.

-
Streamline operations; Accelerates application modernization; Best practices to scale and secure applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
3
Followers
16.5K
Followers
18
Votes
501
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, AWS App2Container?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana