StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Azure App Service vs OpenShift

Azure App Service vs OpenShift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Stacks312
Followers380
Votes11

Azure App Service vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Azure App Service and OpenShift

Azure App Service and OpenShift are both popular platforms for deploying and managing applications, but there are several key differences between them.

  1. Availability: Azure App Service is a cloud-based platform provided by Microsoft, while OpenShift is an open-source platform developed by Red Hat. This means that Azure App Service is available on the Azure cloud, whereas OpenShift can be deployed on various cloud providers or on-premises.

  2. Deployment Models: Azure App Service supports multiple deployment models, including Web Apps, Mobile Apps, and API Apps. It offers a range of options to deploy applications and supports various programming languages and frameworks. On the other hand, OpenShift primarily focuses on container-based deployments using Kubernetes. It provides a scalable and flexible platform for deploying containerized applications.

  3. Management and Configuration: Azure App Service provides a fully managed platform where Microsoft takes care of infrastructure management, security, and scaling. It offers easy configuration and scaling options through the Azure Portal or APIs. OpenShift, being an open-source platform, gives users more control over the management and configuration of their applications. Users can customize and fine-tune the platform according to their specific requirements.

  4. Resource Allocation: Azure App Service allows users to choose from different tiers and plans based on their resource requirements and budget. It provides options for scaling up or down based on demand. OpenShift also offers similar resource allocation capabilities, allowing users to scale their applications and pods as needed. However, OpenShift's resource management might require more configuration and setup compared to Azure App Service.

  5. Platform Ecosystem: Azure App Service integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Active Directory, Azure Database, and Azure Storage. It provides a comprehensive ecosystem of services for building and managing applications. OpenShift, on the other hand, works well with other Red Hat products and tools, providing a more unified environment for development and deployment.

  6. Support and SLA: Azure App Service comes with a robust support system and a Service Level Agreement (SLA) guaranteeing high availability and uptime. Microsoft offers support through various channels and provides regular updates and patches. While OpenShift has an active community and support from Red Hat, the level of support and SLA may vary depending on the deployment model and service provider.

In summary, Azure App Service is a fully managed cloud platform by Microsoft, offering a wide range of deployment options and strong integration with Azure services. OpenShift, on the other hand, is an open-source container platform with more flexibility in management and configuration, providing a unified environment for containerized application deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Azure App Service
Azure App Service

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
312
Followers
1.4K
Followers
380
Votes
517
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 6
    .Net Framework
  • 5
    Visual studio
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, Azure App Service?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase