StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Stacks594
Followers1.1K
Votes130
Google Cloud Bigtable
Google Cloud Bigtable
Stacks173
Followers363
Votes25

Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Bigtable: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Bigtable

Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Bigtable are two popular NoSQL databases that offer different features and capabilities. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Data Model: Azure Cosmos DB uses a multi-model database approach, allowing developers to choose from a variety of data models including document, key-value, columnar, graph, and time-series. On the other hand, Google Cloud Bigtable is a wide-column store that is optimized for storing large amounts of data in a sparse table format.

  2. Scalability: Azure Cosmos DB is designed to provide global scalability out of the box, with the ability to replicate data across multiple regions for high availability and low latency access. It offers built-in horizontal scaling and automatic partitioning of data. In contrast, Google Cloud Bigtable is also scalable but requires manual sharding to distribute data across multiple instances.

  3. Consistency Models: Azure Cosmos DB supports multiple consistency models, including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual consistency. This allows developers to choose the appropriate consistency level based on their application requirements. Google Cloud Bigtable, on the other hand, only provides eventual consistency.

  4. Query Language: Azure Cosmos DB supports SQL-like queries using its SQL API, as well as MongoDB's query language, Cassandra Query Language (CQL), and Gremlin (a graph traversal language). This provides flexibility for developers to write complex queries using familiar syntax. In contrast, Google Cloud Bigtable does not support SQL-like queries and requires developers to use its low-level API for data access.

  5. Managed Service: Azure Cosmos DB is a fully managed database service, providing automatic backups, patching, and automatic scaling. It also offers global distribution capabilities for low latency access. On the other hand, Google Cloud Bigtable requires more manual configuration and management, such as setting up and managing instances, clusters, and backups.

  6. Integration with Other Services: Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Functions, Azure Logic Apps, and Azure Event Grid. This enables developers to build end-to-end solutions using a wide range of services. Google Cloud Bigtable integrates well with other Google Cloud Platform services, such as BigQuery, Dataflow, and Pub/Sub.

In Summary, Azure Cosmos DB offers a multi-model database approach with global scalability, multiple consistency models, and strong integration with other Azure services. Google Cloud Bigtable is a wide-column store optimized for large-scale data storage, but requires more manual configuration and management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Google Cloud Bigtable
Google Cloud Bigtable

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

Fully managed with 99.99% Availability SLA;Elastically and highly scalable (both throughput and storage);Predictable low latency: <10ms @ P99 reads and <15ms @ P99 fully-indexed writes;Globally distributed with multi-region replication;Rich SQL queries over schema-agnostic automatic indexing;JavaScript language integrated multi-record ACID transactions with snapshot isolation;Well-defined tunable consistency models: Strong, Bounded Staleness, Session, and Eventual
Unmatched Performance: Single-digit millisecond latency and over 2X the performance per dollar of unmanaged NoSQL alternatives.;Open Source Interface: Because Cloud Bigtable is accessed through the HBase API, it is natively integrated with much of the existing big data and Hadoop ecosystem and supports Google’s big data products. Additionally, data can be imported from or exported to existing HBase clusters through simple bulk ingestion tools using industry-standard formats.;Low Cost: By providing a fully managed service and exceptional efficiency, Cloud Bigtable’s total cost of ownership is less than half the cost of its direct competition.;Security: Cloud Bigtable is built with a replicated storage strategy, and all data is encrypted both in-flight and at rest.;Simplicity: Creating or reconfiguring a Cloud Bigtable cluster is done through a simple user interface and can be completed in less than 10 seconds. As data is put into Cloud Bigtable the backing storage scales automatically, so there’s no need to do complicated estimates of capacity requirements.;Maturity: Over the past 10+ years, Bigtable has driven Google’s most critical applications. In addition, the HBase API is a industry-standard interface for combined operational and analytical workloads.
Statistics
Stacks
594
Stacks
173
Followers
1.1K
Followers
363
Votes
130
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Best-of-breed NoSQL features
  • 22
    High scalability
  • 15
    Globally distributed
  • 14
    Automatic indexing over flexible json data model
  • 10
    Always on with 99.99% availability sla
Cons
  • 18
    Pricing
  • 4
    Poor No SQL query support
Pros
  • 11
    High performance
  • 9
    Fully managed
  • 5
    High scalability
Integrations
Azure Machine Learning
Azure Machine Learning
MongoDB
MongoDB
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Python
Python
Heroic
Heroic
Hadoop
Hadoop
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to Azure Cosmos DB, Google Cloud Bigtable?

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Cloudant

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

Google Cloud Datastore

Google Cloud Datastore

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

CloudBoost

CloudBoost

CloudBoost.io is a database service for the “next web” - that not only does data-storage, but also search, real-time and a whole lot more which enables developers to build much richer apps with 50% less time saving them a ton of cost and helping them go to market much faster.

Firebase Realtime Database

Firebase Realtime Database

It is a cloud-hosted NoSQL database that lets you store and sync data between your users in realtime. Data is synced across all clients in realtime, and remains available when your app goes offline.

restdb.io

restdb.io

RestDB is a NoSql document oriented database cloud service. Data is accessed as JSON objects via HTTPS. This gives great flexibility, easy system integration and future compatibility.

Amazon DocumentDB

Amazon DocumentDB

Amazon DocumentDB is a non-relational database service designed from the ground-up to give you the performance, scalability, and availability you need when operating mission-critical MongoDB workloads at scale. In Amazon DocumentDB, the storage and compute are decoupled, allowing each to scale independently, and you can increase the read capacity to millions of requests per second by adding up to 15 low latency read replicas in minutes, regardless of the size of your data.

Amazon SimpleDB

Amazon SimpleDB

Developers simply store and query data items via web services requests and Amazon SimpleDB does the rest. Behind the scenes, Amazon SimpleDB creates and manages multiple geographically distributed replicas of your data automatically to enable high availability and data durability. Amazon SimpleDB provides a simple web services interface to create and store multiple data sets, query your data easily, and return the results. Your data is automatically indexed, making it easy to quickly find the information that you need. There is no need to pre-define a schema or change a schema if new data is added later. And scale-out is as simple as creating new domains, rather than building out new servers.

Datomic Cloud

Datomic Cloud

A transactional database with a flexible data model, elastic scaling, and rich queries. Datomic is designed from the ground up to run on AWS. Datomic leverages AWS technology, including DynamoDB, S3, EFS, and CloudFormation to provide a fully integrated solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase