Azure Monitor vs Icinga

Overview

Icinga

Stacks120

Followers97

Votes0

Azure Monitor

Stacks60

Followers184

Votes0

Azure Monitor vs Icinga: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Azure Monitor and Icinga are both monitoring solutions, but they have key differences that provide unique advantages for different use cases.

Hosting and Deployment: Azure Monitor is a cloud-based monitoring solution offered by Microsoft, specifically designed to monitor resources and services within Azure. On the other hand, Icinga is an open-source monitoring tool that can be deployed on-premises or in any cloud environment, offering flexibility in hosting options. This difference in hosting and deployment options can impact the overall monitoring strategy of an organization depending on their infrastructure setup.
Integration Capabilities: Azure Monitor is deeply integrated with other Azure services, providing seamless monitoring and logging across various Azure resources. In contrast, Icinga offers extensive plugins and integrations with third-party tools, enabling monitoring of a wide range of technologies and services beyond just Azure. This difference in integration capabilities allows Icinga users to monitor diverse environments with ease, while Azure Monitor users benefit from the tight integration within the Azure ecosystem.
Pricing Structure: Azure Monitor is a service offered as part of the Microsoft Azure platform, which means users pay for monitoring based on their Azure subscription. Icinga, being open-source, is free to use, but organizations may incur costs for support, maintenance, and additional features. This difference in pricing structure can influence the decision-making process for organizations based on their budget and specific monitoring requirements.
Scalability and Performance: Azure Monitor is designed to handle large-scale monitoring of cloud resources with scalability and performance optimizations built-in. Icinga, while capable of scaling to a certain extent, may require additional configuration and resources to achieve similar levels of scalability as Azure Monitor in a cloud environment. This difference in scalability and performance capabilities can impact the monitoring efficiency and responsiveness for organizations with dynamic workloads.
Alerting and Notification: Azure Monitor provides built-in alerting and notification features that can be seamlessly integrated with other Azure services for automated response to monitoring events. In comparison, Icinga offers customizable alerting options with different notification plugins available for integrating with various communication channels. This difference in alerting and notification mechanisms can influence the incident response processes and workflow automation capabilities of organizations using these monitoring solutions.
Community Support and Development: Icinga benefits from a strong open-source community that actively contributes to its development, continuous improvements, and support resources. Azure Monitor, being a service provided by Microsoft, offers dedicated support channels and resources backed by the company. This difference in community support and development models can impact the availability of resources, updates, and community-driven solutions for users of these monitoring tools.

In Summary, Azure Monitor and Icinga offer distinct features and advantages in hosting, integration, pricing, scalability, alerting, and community support, catering to different monitoring requirements and environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Icinga, Azure Monitor

Matthias

Teamlead IT at NanoTemper Technologies

Jun 11, 2020

Decided

free open source
modern interface and architecture
large community
extendable I knew Nagios for decades but it was really outdated (by its architecture) at some point. That's why Icinga started first as a fork, not with Icinga2 it is completely built from scratch but backward-compatible with Nagios plugins. Now it has reached a state with which I am confident.

142k views142k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Icinga	Azure Monitor
It monitors availability and performance, gives you simple access to relevant data and raises alerts to keep you in the loop. It was originally created as a fork of the Nagios system monitoring application.	It provides sophisticated tools for collecting and analyzing telemetry that allow you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud and on-premises resources and applications.
-	Store and analyze all your operational telemetry in a centralized, fully managed, scalable data store that’s optimized for performance and cost; Test your hypotheses and reveal hidden patterns using the advanced analytic engine, interactive query language, and built-in machine learning constructs; Integrate with popular DevOps, issue management, IT service management, and security information and event management tools
Statistics
Stacks 120	Stacks 60
Followers 97	Followers 184
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Jira Azure DevOps PagerDuty BindPlane

What are some alternatives to Icinga, Azure Monitor?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Azure Monitor vs Icinga: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Azure Monitor and Icinga are both monitoring solutions, but they have key differences that provide unique advantages for different use cases.

Hosting and Deployment: Azure Monitor is a cloud-based monitoring solution offered by Microsoft, specifically designed to monitor resources and services within Azure. On the other hand, Icinga is an open-source monitoring tool that can be deployed on-premises or in any cloud environment, offering flexibility in hosting options. This difference in hosting and deployment options can impact the overall monitoring strategy of an organization depending on their infrastructure setup.
Integration Capabilities: Azure Monitor is deeply integrated with other Azure services, providing seamless monitoring and logging across various Azure resources. In contrast, Icinga offers extensive plugins and integrations with third-party tools, enabling monitoring of a wide range of technologies and services beyond just Azure. This difference in integration capabilities allows Icinga users to monitor diverse environments with ease, while Azure Monitor users benefit from the tight integration within the Azure ecosystem.
Pricing Structure: Azure Monitor is a service offered as part of the Microsoft Azure platform, which means users pay for monitoring based on their Azure subscription. Icinga, being open-source, is free to use, but organizations may incur costs for support, maintenance, and additional features. This difference in pricing structure can influence the decision-making process for organizations based on their budget and specific monitoring requirements.
Scalability and Performance: Azure Monitor is designed to handle large-scale monitoring of cloud resources with scalability and performance optimizations built-in. Icinga, while capable of scaling to a certain extent, may require additional configuration and resources to achieve similar levels of scalability as Azure Monitor in a cloud environment. This difference in scalability and performance capabilities can impact the monitoring efficiency and responsiveness for organizations with dynamic workloads.
Alerting and Notification: Azure Monitor provides built-in alerting and notification features that can be seamlessly integrated with other Azure services for automated response to monitoring events. In comparison, Icinga offers customizable alerting options with different notification plugins available for integrating with various communication channels. This difference in alerting and notification mechanisms can influence the incident response processes and workflow automation capabilities of organizations using these monitoring solutions.
Community Support and Development: Icinga benefits from a strong open-source community that actively contributes to its development, continuous improvements, and support resources. Azure Monitor, being a service provided by Microsoft, offers dedicated support channels and resources backed by the company. This difference in community support and development models can impact the availability of resources, updates, and community-driven solutions for users of these monitoring tools.

Azure Monitor vs Icinga

Overview