Azure Monitor vs Munin

Overview

Munin

Stacks71

Followers95

Votes10

GitHub Stars2.1K

Forks479

Azure Monitor

Stacks61

Followers184

Votes0

Azure Monitor vs Munin: What are the differences?

Data Sources: Azure Monitor primarily collects data from Azure services and resources, providing deep insights into the Azure environment. On the other hand, Munin focuses on monitoring the performance of networked servers and services using plugins for data collection.
Scalability: Azure Monitor is highly scalable and can handle a massive amount of data and monitoring requirements in a dynamic cloud environment. In contrast, Munin is more suitable for smaller to medium-sized setups due to its limitations in scaling up to large infrastructures.
Alerting and Notifications: Azure Monitor offers robust alerting capabilities with built-in integration with other Azure services, enabling proactive monitoring and notifications. Munin provides basic alerting functionalities but may require third-party solutions for advanced notification features.
Visualization and Dashboards: Azure Monitor provides customizable dashboards and visualizations for comprehensive data analysis and reporting, offering a rich set of tools for monitoring and troubleshooting. Munin, although capable of generating graphs and reports, may require additional plugins or configurations for advanced visualization options.
Integration: Azure Monitor seamlessly integrates with other Azure services and third-party tools, facilitating a more holistic approach to monitoring and management in the Azure ecosystem. Munin, while extensible through plugins, may require more manual configuration to integrate with external systems or services.
Cost Structure: Azure Monitor's pricing is based on the volume of data ingested and features utilized, making it scalable and cost-effective for varying monitoring needs. Munin, being open-source, offers a more upfront cost-effective solution but may incur additional costs for certain plugins or integrations.

In Summary, Azure Monitor and Munin have key differences in data sources, scalability, alerting capabilities, visualization options, integration possibilities, and cost structures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Munin	Azure Monitor
Munin is a networked resource monitoring tool that can help analyze resource trends and "what just happened to kill our performance?" problems. It is designed to be very plug and play. A default installation provides a lot of graphs with almost no work.	It provides sophisticated tools for collecting and analyzing telemetry that allow you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud and on-premises resources and applications.
-	Store and analyze all your operational telemetry in a centralized, fully managed, scalable data store that’s optimized for performance and cost; Test your hypotheses and reveal hidden patterns using the advanced analytic engine, interactive query language, and built-in machine learning constructs; Integrate with popular DevOps, issue management, IT service management, and security information and event management tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 479	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 71	Stacks 61
Followers 95	Followers 184
Votes 10	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Good defaults 2 Adheres to traditional Linux standards 2 Alerts can trigger any command line program 2 Extremely fast to install 1 Easy to write custom plugins	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Jira Azure DevOps PagerDuty BindPlane

What are some alternatives to Munin, Azure Monitor?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Azure Monitor vs Munin: What are the differences?

Data Sources: Azure Monitor primarily collects data from Azure services and resources, providing deep insights into the Azure environment. On the other hand, Munin focuses on monitoring the performance of networked servers and services using plugins for data collection.
Scalability: Azure Monitor is highly scalable and can handle a massive amount of data and monitoring requirements in a dynamic cloud environment. In contrast, Munin is more suitable for smaller to medium-sized setups due to its limitations in scaling up to large infrastructures.
Alerting and Notifications: Azure Monitor offers robust alerting capabilities with built-in integration with other Azure services, enabling proactive monitoring and notifications. Munin provides basic alerting functionalities but may require third-party solutions for advanced notification features.
Visualization and Dashboards: Azure Monitor provides customizable dashboards and visualizations for comprehensive data analysis and reporting, offering a rich set of tools for monitoring and troubleshooting. Munin, although capable of generating graphs and reports, may require additional plugins or configurations for advanced visualization options.
Integration: Azure Monitor seamlessly integrates with other Azure services and third-party tools, facilitating a more holistic approach to monitoring and management in the Azure ecosystem. Munin, while extensible through plugins, may require more manual configuration to integrate with external systems or services.
Cost Structure: Azure Monitor's pricing is based on the volume of data ingested and features utilized, making it scalable and cost-effective for varying monitoring needs. Munin, being open-source, offers a more upfront cost-effective solution but may incur additional costs for certain plugins or integrations.

In Summary, Azure Monitor and Munin have key differences in data sources, scalability, alerting capabilities, visualization options, integration possibilities, and cost structures.

Azure Monitor vs Munin

Overview