StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Bitnami Stacksmith vs Harbor

Bitnami Stacksmith vs Harbor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitnami Stacksmith
Bitnami Stacksmith
Stacks4
Followers29
Votes0
Harbor
Harbor
Stacks182
Followers185
Votes11
GitHub Stars26.8K
Forks5.0K

Bitnami Stacksmith vs Harbor: What are the differences?

Comparison between Bitnami Stacksmith and Harbor

Bitnami Stacksmith and Harbor are two popular tools used for managing and containerizing applications. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that can impact their suitability for certain use cases.

  1. Installation Process: Bitnami Stacksmith simplifies the installation process by automating the creation of containerized applications, including all the necessary dependencies. In contrast, Harbor requires manual installation and configuration, which can be more time-consuming and complex.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: Bitnami Stacksmith supports multiple cloud platforms, enabling easy deployment on various providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. On the other hand, Harbor is primarily designed for on-premises deployments, limiting its flexibility for cloud-native environments.

  3. Security Features: Harbor offers advanced security features, such as vulnerability scanning and image signing, ensuring the reliability and safety of container images. While Bitnami Stacksmith also provides some security measures, it may not have the same level of granularity and comprehensive security features as Harbor.

  4. Feature Extensibility: Bitnami Stacksmith comes with pre-built templates and configurations for popular applications and frameworks, reducing the need for extensive customization. However, Harbor offers more extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific requirements, making it more suitable for complex enterprise environments.

  5. Image Repository: Bitnami Stacksmith does not provide its own dedicated image repository but allows users to push their container images to any compatible registry. In contrast, Harbor includes its own image repository, providing a centralized location for managing and storing container images.

  6. User Interface: Bitnami Stacksmith offers a user-friendly web interface, simplifying the application containerization process and making it more accessible to users with limited technical knowledge. Harbor, being more developer-centric, offers a more command-line-driven interface, which may require a higher level of technical expertise for efficient usage.

In summary, Bitnami Stacksmith simplifies the installation and deployment process, provides pre-built templates, and has a user-friendly interface. On the other hand, Harbor offers advanced security features, more extensive customization options, and includes its own image repository, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bitnami Stacksmith
Bitnami Stacksmith
Harbor
Harbor

Pick your favorite development environments ready-to-run including: Python, Java, PHP, Go, Ruby and Node. Layer on the web frameworks you need to kick-start your project including: Symfony, Express, Rails, and Django.

Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

Creates custom container images in minutes, then lets you share them using a simple URL; Sends notifications of security issues and out-of-date components straight to your inbox; Makes it easy to package your web application or service in a unique container image; Builds on top of Bitnami’s curated runtimes and components so you can develop new features more quickly and keep them up-to-date with less effort
Multi-tenant content signing and validation;Image replication between instances;Extensible API and graphical UI;Security and vulnerability analysis;Identity integration and role-based access control;Internationalization
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.0K
Stacks
4
Stacks
182
Followers
29
Followers
185
Votes
0
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Good on-premises container registry
  • 1
    Support multiple authentication methods
  • 1
    Supports OIDC
  • 1
    Supports LDAP/Active Directory
  • 1
    Perfect for Teams and Organizations
Integrations
Bitnami
Bitnami
Docker
Docker
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to Bitnami Stacksmith, Harbor?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana