StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Blue Ocean vs Github Actions

Blue Ocean vs Github Actions

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean
Stacks92
Followers167
Votes7
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks537
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Blue Ocean vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction

Blue Ocean and GitHub Actions are two popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous deployment in software development. While they both aim to streamline the software development process, there are key differences between them. Below are the six key differences between Blue Ocean and GitHub Actions:

  1. Integration with Jenkins: Blue Ocean is a plugin for Jenkins, an open-source automation server, while GitHub Actions is integrated directly into the GitHub platform. This means that Blue Ocean requires a separate Jenkins installation, whereas GitHub Actions is available directly within the GitHub repository without any additional setup.

  2. Workflow Configuration: Blue Ocean uses a graphical user interface (GUI) to visually create and configure pipelines, making it more intuitive for users who prefer a visual representation of their CI/CD workflows. On the other hand, GitHub Actions uses YAML-based configuration files, providing a more flexible and version-controlled approach to defining workflows.

  3. Marketplace and Community Support: GitHub Actions has a vast marketplace where users can discover and share various pre-built workflows or actions, making it easier to reuse existing solutions. Blue Ocean, while having plugins available from Jenkins, does not have a central marketplace like GitHub Actions, which limits the availability of pre-built integrations and community support.

  4. Integration with Git: GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with Git, allowing developers to trigger workflows based on specific events such as pull requests, commits, or releases. Blue Ocean, being integrated with Jenkins, also supports Git integration but requires additional configuration to achieve similar functionality compared to GitHub Actions.

  5. Security and User Access Control: GitHub Actions provides granular access control and security measures through the use of GitHub's built-in authentication and permission management system. Blue Ocean, being an extension of Jenkins, may require additional configuration and plugins to achieve similar security and user access control features.

  6. Scalability and Availability: GitHub Actions is a cloud-based service provided by GitHub, ensuring high availability and scalability. Blue Ocean's scalability and availability depend on the underlying Jenkins installation, which may require additional infrastructure and maintenance.

In Summary, Blue Ocean and GitHub Actions differ in their integration with Jenkins/GitHub platforms, workflow configuration methods, marketplace/community support, Git integration, security/user access control, and scalability/availability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Blue Ocean, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Sophisticated visualizations of CD pipelines, allowing for fast and intuitive comprehension of software pipeline status.;Pipeline editor (In Development) that makes automating CD pipelines approachable by guiding the user through an intuitive and visual process to create a pipeline.;Personalization of the Jenkins UI to suit the role-based needs of each member of the DevOps team.;Pinpoint precision when intervention is needed and/or issues arise. The Blue Ocean UI shows where in the pipeline attention is needed, facilitating exception handling and increasing productivity.;Native integration for branch and pull requests enables maximum developer productivity when collaborating on code with others in GitHub and Bitbucket.
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
537
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
92
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
167
Followers
3.1K
Votes
7
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Beautiful interface
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 2
    Read actions in Marketplace
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No manual launch
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Blue Ocean, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana