Cacoo vs Zen Flowchart: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When comparing Cacoo and Zen Flowchart, there are several key differences that set these two tools apart in terms of features and functionalities.

1. **Collaboration Tools**: Cacoo offers real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple users to work on a flowchart simultaneously. Zen Flowchart, on the other hand, lacks robust collaboration tools and is more suited for individual use.
   
2. **Pre-designed Templates**: Cacoo provides a wide range of pre-designed templates, making it easier for users to create professional-looking flowcharts quickly. In contrast, Zen Flowchart has limited template options, requiring users to create flowcharts from scratch.

3. **Integration with Other Platforms**: Cacoo integrates seamlessly with various platforms, such as Google Drive and Slack, facilitating easy sharing and collaboration. Zen Flowchart has limited integration options, making it less versatile in terms of connectivity.

4. **Advanced Features**: Cacoo offers advanced features like version history, comments, and revision tracking, enhancing the overall workflow and collaboration experience. Zen Flowchart lacks some of these advanced functionalities, which may limit the user's ability to track changes effectively.

5. **Mobile Accessibility**: Cacoo provides mobile apps for iOS and Android, allowing users to access and edit their flowcharts on the go. In contrast, Zen Flowchart may not have dedicated mobile applications, limiting its accessibility and usability outside of desktop environments.

6. **Cost Structure**: Cacoo offers flexible pricing plans, including a free version with limited features, making it accessible to users with different budget constraints. Zen Flowchart may have a higher price point or lack a free version, which could be a determining factor for users seeking a cost-effective solution.

In Summary, Cacoo and Zen Flowchart differ in terms of collaboration tools, template options, integration capabilities, advanced features, mobile accessibility, and cost structure.