Camunda vs Github Actions

Overview

Camunda

Stacks191

Followers216

Votes0

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Camunda vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Camunda and Github Actions, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two platforms for automation and workflow management.

Target Usage: One significant difference between Camunda and Github Actions is their target usage. Camunda is primarily focused on business process management and workflow automation, providing a wide range of BPM tools and features. On the other hand, Github Actions is tailored more towards software development and continuous integration/continuous deployment workflows.
Integration with version control: While both Camunda and Github Actions support integrations with version control systems, the level of integration differs. Camunda provides advanced integration capabilities with multiple version control systems, enabling seamless workflow management across different platforms. In contrast, Github Actions is tightly integrated with Github repositories, offering streamlined automation workflows within the Github ecosystem.
Workflow Design and Customization: Another key difference lies in the workflow design and customization options provided by Camunda and Github Actions. Camunda offers a visual BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) editor, allowing users to create complex, visually represented workflows with drag-and-drop functionality. On the other hand, Github Actions utilizes YAML configuration files for defining workflows, which may require a higher level of technical expertise for customization.
Scalability and Deployment Options: When it comes to scalability and deployment options, Camunda offers robust support for scaling workflows across enterprise applications and cloud environments. It provides on-premise, cloud, and hybrid deployment options to accommodate diverse organizational needs. In contrast, Github Actions is more suitable for smaller to medium-sized projects, providing scalability within the Github platform but may have limitations when scaling to larger enterprise workflows.
Community and Support: The community and support ecosystem around Camunda and Github Actions also differ in terms of size and specialization. Camunda has a strong community of business process management professionals and a dedicated support network, offering extensive resources and documentation for users. Github Actions, being a part of the larger Github community, benefits from a vast pool of developers and resources focused on software development and DevOps practices.
Licensing and Cost: One of the key differences between Camunda and Github Actions is the licensing and cost models they follow. Camunda offers both open-source and enterprise versions, providing flexibility in terms of licensing options for different use cases. In contrast, Github Actions is bundled with Github repositories and may require subscription plans for advanced features and increased usage limits.

In Summary, Camunda and Github Actions differ in their target usage, integration with version control, workflow design, scalability, community support, and licensing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Camunda, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Camunda	GitHub Actions
Camunda enables organizations to operationalize and automate AI, integrating human tasks, existing and future systems without compromising security, governance, or innovation.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
Agentic orchestration; Process orchestration; Workflow automation; Decision automation	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 191	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 216	Followers 3.1K
Votes 0	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No manual launch
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid Asana HubSpot Slack GitLab ActiveMQ RabbitMQ Kafka Redis Google Cloud VPC	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Camunda, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Camunda vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Camunda and Github Actions, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two platforms for automation and workflow management.

Target Usage: One significant difference between Camunda and Github Actions is their target usage. Camunda is primarily focused on business process management and workflow automation, providing a wide range of BPM tools and features. On the other hand, Github Actions is tailored more towards software development and continuous integration/continuous deployment workflows.
Integration with version control: While both Camunda and Github Actions support integrations with version control systems, the level of integration differs. Camunda provides advanced integration capabilities with multiple version control systems, enabling seamless workflow management across different platforms. In contrast, Github Actions is tightly integrated with Github repositories, offering streamlined automation workflows within the Github ecosystem.
Workflow Design and Customization: Another key difference lies in the workflow design and customization options provided by Camunda and Github Actions. Camunda offers a visual BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) editor, allowing users to create complex, visually represented workflows with drag-and-drop functionality. On the other hand, Github Actions utilizes YAML configuration files for defining workflows, which may require a higher level of technical expertise for customization.
Scalability and Deployment Options: When it comes to scalability and deployment options, Camunda offers robust support for scaling workflows across enterprise applications and cloud environments. It provides on-premise, cloud, and hybrid deployment options to accommodate diverse organizational needs. In contrast, Github Actions is more suitable for smaller to medium-sized projects, providing scalability within the Github platform but may have limitations when scaling to larger enterprise workflows.
Community and Support: The community and support ecosystem around Camunda and Github Actions also differ in terms of size and specialization. Camunda has a strong community of business process management professionals and a dedicated support network, offering extensive resources and documentation for users. Github Actions, being a part of the larger Github community, benefits from a vast pool of developers and resources focused on software development and DevOps practices.
Licensing and Cost: One of the key differences between Camunda and Github Actions is the licensing and cost models they follow. Camunda offers both open-source and enterprise versions, providing flexibility in terms of licensing options for different use cases. In contrast, Github Actions is bundled with Github repositories and may require subscription plans for advanced features and increased usage limits.

In Summary, Camunda and Github Actions differ in their target usage, integration with version control, workflow design, scalability, community support, and licensing models.