StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. CapRover vs Render.com

CapRover vs Render.com

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Render
Render
Stacks276
Followers229
Votes157
CapRover
CapRover
Stacks56
Followers94
Votes54
GitHub Stars14.6K
Forks941

CapRover vs Render.com: What are the differences?

CapRover is an open-source platform that helps developers easily deploy and manage containerized apps, while Render.com is a cloud platform that provides a hassle-free way to deploy and scale web applications and static sites. While both platforms serve similar purposes, they have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Pricing: CapRover is a self-hosted solution, which means you have complete control over your infrastructure and can deploy it on your own servers or cloud providers. This allows for more cost-effective deployments as you pay only for the resources you use. On the other hand, Render.com is a fully managed platform with a simplified pricing model, charging based on actual usage and taking care of the infrastructure management for you. This convenience, however, may come with slightly higher costs.

  2. Managed Databases: Render.com offers managed databases as a service, making it easy to provision and manage databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, and Redis. This simplifies the process of setting up and maintaining databases for your applications. CapRover, on the other hand, requires you to handle the setup and management of databases yourself, giving you more flexibility and control.

  3. Integration with CI/CD: Render.com has native support for continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) workflows, allowing you to integrate with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. This enables automatic deployments whenever you push changes to your codebase. CapRover also supports CI/CD, but requires additional setup and configuration using tools like Jenkins or GitLab CI/CD.

  4. Container Registry: CapRover includes its own container registry, allowing you to easily build and push container images without the need for a separate registry. Render.com, on the other hand, requires you to use external container registries like Docker Hub or Google Container Registry. This can be advantageous if you already have a preferred container registry or want more control over your image storage.

  5. Scalability and Load Balancing: Render.com provides built-in load balancing and automatic scaling for your applications, allowing them to handle increased traffic without manual configuration. CapRover does not offer built-in load balancing or automatic scaling, requiring you to set up and manage these aspects yourself using tools like Kubernetes or load balancers provided by your cloud provider.

  6. Community and Support: CapRover is an open-source project with an active community of developers contributing to its development and providing support through forums and GitHub. Render.com, being a fully managed platform, offers dedicated support from their team, helping you resolve any issues or provide guidance when needed.

In Summary, CapRover offers more control, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness with self-hosted deployments and a dedicated community, while Render.com provides convenience, managed databases, and built-in CI/CD support for easy deployment and scaling of your applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Render
Render
CapRover
CapRover

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.

Instant and continuous deploys from GitHub and GitLab; Global CDN; Fully managed PostgreSQL; Free SSL and custom domains; Static Sites; Private Networking; Disks; Cron jobs; Background workers; Dockerfile support; Infrastructure as Code; Simple, predictable pricing; Amazing support; Native support for Node, Elixir, Go, Ruby, Python, Rust; Reduced complexity; Zero Devops; No servers to manage.
CLI for automation and scripting; Web GUI for ease of access and convenience; No lock-in! Remove CapRover and your apps keep working!; Docker Swarm under the hood for containerization and clustering; Nginx (fully customizable template) under the hood for load-balancing; Let's Encrypt under the hood for free SSL (HTTPS)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
14.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
941
Stacks
276
Stacks
56
Followers
229
Followers
94
Votes
157
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 24
    Very easy to start
  • 18
    Pull Request Previews
  • 18
    Infrastructure as Code
  • 18
    Zero Downtime Deploys
  • 18
    Easy deployment
Pros
  • 12
    Opensource
  • 12
    Mangage complex infrastructure easily
  • 8
    Auto SSL
  • 6
    Docker
  • 6
    Easy instalation
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Ruby
Ruby
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
GitHub
GitHub
Rust
Rust
Golang
Golang
Elixir
Elixir
GitLab
GitLab
MongoDB
MongoDB
Docker
Docker
Node.js
Node.js
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
NGINX
NGINX
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
WordPress
WordPress

What are some alternatives to Render, CapRover?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase