Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

Checkmk

Stacks77

Followers99

Votes0

Checkmk vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Key differences between Checkmk and Zabbix

Checkmk and Zabbix are two popular network monitoring solutions that offer different features and functionalities. Here are the key differences between them:

Scalability: Checkmk is more scalable compared to Zabbix when it comes to handling large-scale environments. With its distributed monitoring architecture and efficient handling of thousands of hosts and services, Checkmk is suitable for organizations with extensive monitoring needs. On the other hand, Zabbix can also handle a significant number of hosts but may require additional configurations and optimizations for larger deployments.
Ease of Use: Checkmk offers a user-friendly web interface with intuitive navigation that simplifies the monitoring setup and configuration process. Additionally, it provides various automation features like automatic service recognition and rule-based monitoring, making it easier for administrators to manage monitoring tasks. While Zabbix also offers a user-friendly interface, it may require more effort to configure and set up monitoring compared to Checkmk.
Monitoring Flexibility: Checkmk provides a wide range of monitoring options, including agent-based, agentless, and SNMP-based monitoring. This flexibility allows administrators to choose the most suitable method for their environment. Zabbix, on the other hand, primarily relies on agent-based monitoring, which may require additional efforts for monitoring devices without agents.
Notification System: Checkmk offers a flexible and customizable notification system that allows administrators to configure notification rules based on various criteria. It supports different notification channels like email, SMS, and push notifications, and provides options for escalations and acknowledgments. Zabbix also provides a notification system but may have less flexibility compared to Checkmk in terms of customization options.
Graphing and Reporting: Checkmk offers powerful graphing capabilities with detailed reports on performance trends and historical data. It provides various graphing options and allows for customization of graph views. Zabbix also provides graphing and reporting features but may not offer the same level of customization compared to Checkmk.
Community and Support: Checkmk benefits from a large and active community, which provides extensive documentation, plugins, and community-contributed features. It also offers commercial support options for enterprise users. Zabbix also has a supportive community, but it may not be as extensive as Checkmk's community.

In summary, Checkmk offers scalability, ease of use, monitoring flexibility, a customizable notification system, advanced graphing and reporting capabilities, and a strong community and support network. While Zabbix is also a capable network monitoring solution, it may require additional effort for scalability, setup, and customization compared to Checkmk.

🔥 Trending in Monitoring on StackShare

diffora.io

Monitoring

diffora.io

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Advice on Zabbix, Checkmk

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	Checkmk
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	Checkmk is a comprehensive solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors.
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	State-based monitoring; Log- and event-based monitoring;Graphing and analytics;Customizable GUI;Reporting;Business Intelligence;Hardware and software inventory;Notifications and alert handler;Rule-based configuration, auto-discovery and agent deployment; Scalability; User Management with LDAP/Active Directory;Predictive Monitoring; Capacity Management; Single Sign-On; Dynamic host configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 684	Stacks 77
Followers 981	Followers 99
Votes 66	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Checkmk?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).