StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. CodebaseHQ vs GitBucket

CodebaseHQ vs GitBucket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitBucket
GitBucket
Stacks79
Followers177
Votes36
CodebaseHQ
CodebaseHQ
Stacks3
Followers1
Votes0

CodebaseHQ vs GitBucket: What are the differences?

What is CodebaseHQ? Git, Mercurial & Subversion hosting with project management. It is the ultimate code hosting platform for professional development teams. Includes source tree browser, in-line comments, notes, and a powerful ticketing system.

What is GitBucket? The easily installable Github clone powered by Scala. GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

CodebaseHQ and GitBucket belong to "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by CodebaseHQ are:

  • Code Hosting
  • Project Management Tools
  • Ticket Tracking System

On the other hand, GitBucket provides the following key features:

  • Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access)
  • Repository viewer and online file editing
  • Repository search (Code and Issues)

GitBucket is an open source tool with 8.16K GitHub stars and 1.14K GitHub forks. Here's a link to GitBucket's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitBucket
GitBucket
CodebaseHQ
CodebaseHQ

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

It is the ultimate code hosting platform for professional development teams. Includes source tree browser, in-line comments, notes, and a powerful ticketing system.

Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support
Code Hosting; Project Management Tools; Ticket Tracking System
Statistics
Stacks
79
Stacks
3
Followers
177
Followers
1
Votes
36
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Self hosted
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Familiar interface
  • 5
    Scala
  • 5
    Simple setup
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Mercurial
Mercurial

What are some alternatives to GitBucket, CodebaseHQ?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana