CodeRunner vs Visual Studio Code

Overview

Visual Studio Code

Stacks186.5K

Followers169.1K

Votes2.3K

GitHub Stars178.2K

Forks35.9K

CodeRunner

Stacks18

Followers53

Votes0

CodeRunner vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Introduction: CodeRunner and Visual Studio Code are two popular code editors used by developers. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences to understand which code editor may be more suitable for different use cases.

Language Support: CodeRunner supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to C, C++, Java, Python, Ruby, and Swift. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, offers a larger language support out of the box, with support for over 50 programming languages.
Extensibility and Customization: Visual Studio Code provides a more extensive ecosystem of extensions and plugins, allowing users to customize and enhance their coding experience to a greater extent. CodeRunner, on the other hand, has a more limited set of customization options, with less flexibility in terms of extending its functionalities.
Debugger Integration: Visual Studio Code offers powerful debugger integration, allowing developers to step through their code, set breakpoints, inspect variables, and more. CodeRunner, while it does have a basic debugger, doesn't provide the same level of debugging capabilities as Visual Studio Code.
Integrated Git Support: Visual Studio Code comes with integrated Git support, enabling users to easily manage version control tasks within the editor itself. CodeRunner does not offer built-in Git integration, which means users would need to use external tools or commands for version control tasks.
User Interface and Ease of Use: Visual Studio Code provides a highly customizable user interface, with a sidebar, activity bar, and a powerful command palette. CodeRunner, on the other hand, offers a more minimalistic and straightforward interface, which may appeal to developers who prefer a simpler coding environment.
Price and Licensing: CodeRunner is a paid code editor available at a one-time purchase cost. Visual Studio Code, however, is free and open-source, making it more accessible to a larger audience and more suitable for budget-conscious users.

In Summary, Visual Studio Code offers a wider language support, extensive customization options, better debugger integration, built-in Git support, a feature-rich user interface, and free access. CodeRunner, on the other hand, supports a decent range of programming languages, has a simpler interface, and comes at a cost. The choice between the two depends on the individual's requirements, preferences, and budget.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Visual Studio Code, CodeRunner

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.

Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.

1.36M views1.36M

Comments

Simon

Student at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Jan 9, 2020

Decided

I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!

1.29M views1.29M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Visual Studio Code	CodeRunner
Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.	It is a slick, great-looking editor that lets you compose and test code in just about any language you can throw at it
Combines UI of a modern editor with code assistance and navigation; Integrated debugging experience	Advanced Code Completion; Run Code in Any Language; Debugging with Breakpoints
Statistics
GitHub Stars 178.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 35.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 186.5K	Stacks 18
Followers 169.1K	Followers 53
Votes 2.3K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 341 Powerful multilanguage IDE 310 Fast 194 Front-end develop out of the box 158 Support TypeScript IntelliSense 142 Very basic but free Cons 46 Slow startup 29 Resource hog at times 20 Poor refactoring 14 Poor UI Designer 11 Weak Ui design tools	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript OpenFL Perl Ruby C# C++ Java UltraEdit TSLint Kite

What are some alternatives to Visual Studio Code, CodeRunner?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

VSCodium

It is a community-driven, freely-licensed binary distribution of Microsoft’s editor VSCode.

TextMate

TextMate brings Apple's approach to operating systems into the world of text editors. By bridging UNIX underpinnings and GUI, TextMate cherry-picks the best of both worlds to the benefit of expert scripters and novice users alike.

gedit

gedit is the GNOME text editor. While aiming at simplicity and ease of use, gedit is a powerful general purpose text editor.

Related Comparisons

CodeRunner vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Language Support: CodeRunner supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to C, C++, Java, Python, Ruby, and Swift. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, offers a larger language support out of the box, with support for over 50 programming languages.
Extensibility and Customization: Visual Studio Code provides a more extensive ecosystem of extensions and plugins, allowing users to customize and enhance their coding experience to a greater extent. CodeRunner, on the other hand, has a more limited set of customization options, with less flexibility in terms of extending its functionalities.
Debugger Integration: Visual Studio Code offers powerful debugger integration, allowing developers to step through their code, set breakpoints, inspect variables, and more. CodeRunner, while it does have a basic debugger, doesn't provide the same level of debugging capabilities as Visual Studio Code.
Integrated Git Support: Visual Studio Code comes with integrated Git support, enabling users to easily manage version control tasks within the editor itself. CodeRunner does not offer built-in Git integration, which means users would need to use external tools or commands for version control tasks.
User Interface and Ease of Use: Visual Studio Code provides a highly customizable user interface, with a sidebar, activity bar, and a powerful command palette. CodeRunner, on the other hand, offers a more minimalistic and straightforward interface, which may appeal to developers who prefer a simpler coding environment.
Price and Licensing: CodeRunner is a paid code editor available at a one-time purchase cost. Visual Studio Code, however, is free and open-source, making it more accessible to a larger audience and more suitable for budget-conscious users.

CodeRunner vs Visual Studio Code

Overview