Concourse vs Zuul CI

Overview

Concourse

Stacks254

Followers393

Votes54

GitHub Stars7.6K

Forks870

Zuul CI

Stacks5

Followers21

Votes3

Concourse vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Concourse and Zuul CI are both popular Continuous Integration (CI) tools used in software development to automate the build, test, and deployment process of applications. While they serve the same purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: Concourse follows a pipeline-based architecture where each step in the process is defined in a declarative configuration file. In contrast, Zuul CI uses a project-based architecture where each project has its own set of CI jobs, making it easier to manage workflows for individual projects.
Scalability: Concourse is known for its scalability as it can easily handle a large number of pipelines and jobs by distributing workload across multiple workers. On the other hand, Zuul CI is designed to scale horizontally by running multiple instances of the Zuul scheduler to manage the workload.
Plugin Ecosystem: Concourse has a limited number of plugins available compared to Zuul CI, which has a rich ecosystem of plugins that can be used to extend its functionality. This makes Zuul CI more versatile in terms of integrating with different tools and services.
Trigger Mechanism: Concourse uses a resource-based trigger mechanism where a pipeline is triggered based on changes to external resources like Git repositories. In contrast, Zuul CI uses a gearman-based trigger system that allows for more granular control over triggering jobs based on specific events.
Community Support: Concourse has an active community that regularly contributes to its development and provides support through forums and documentation. On the other hand, Zuul CI, being a project under the OpenStack Foundation, has a strong community backing from major organizations in the industry.
Customization: Concourse offers more flexibility in defining custom resources and tasks using containers, making it suitable for complex build and deployment scenarios. Zuul CI, on the other hand, provides a more curated set of features, focusing on streamlining the CI process for large-scale projects.

In Summary, Concourse and Zuul CI differ in their architecture, scalability, plugin ecosystem, trigger mechanism, community support, and customization options, catering to different needs of software development teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Concourse, Zuul CI

veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Concourse	Zuul CI
Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.	It is an open source CI/CD platform specializing in gating changes across multiple systems and applications before landing a single patch.
-	Project Gating;CI/CD with Ansible;Cross-Project Dependencies
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 870	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 254	Stacks 5
Followers 393	Followers 21
Votes 54	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 16 Real pipelines 10 Containerised builds 9 Flexible engine 6 Fast 4 Open source Cons 2 Fail forward instead of rollback pattern	Pros 1 Open-source Mostly used with Openstack 1 No vendor-lock In. Zero Cost 1 Hard to configure
Integrations
No integrations available	Zookeeper

What are some alternatives to Concourse, Zuul CI?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Concourse vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: Concourse follows a pipeline-based architecture where each step in the process is defined in a declarative configuration file. In contrast, Zuul CI uses a project-based architecture where each project has its own set of CI jobs, making it easier to manage workflows for individual projects.
Scalability: Concourse is known for its scalability as it can easily handle a large number of pipelines and jobs by distributing workload across multiple workers. On the other hand, Zuul CI is designed to scale horizontally by running multiple instances of the Zuul scheduler to manage the workload.
Plugin Ecosystem: Concourse has a limited number of plugins available compared to Zuul CI, which has a rich ecosystem of plugins that can be used to extend its functionality. This makes Zuul CI more versatile in terms of integrating with different tools and services.
Trigger Mechanism: Concourse uses a resource-based trigger mechanism where a pipeline is triggered based on changes to external resources like Git repositories. In contrast, Zuul CI uses a gearman-based trigger system that allows for more granular control over triggering jobs based on specific events.
Community Support: Concourse has an active community that regularly contributes to its development and provides support through forums and documentation. On the other hand, Zuul CI, being a project under the OpenStack Foundation, has a strong community backing from major organizations in the industry.
Customization: Concourse offers more flexibility in defining custom resources and tasks using containers, making it suitable for complex build and deployment scenarios. Zuul CI, on the other hand, provides a more curated set of features, focusing on streamlining the CI process for large-scale projects.

Concourse vs Zuul CI

Overview