StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. CumulusCI vs Jenkins

CumulusCI vs Jenkins

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
CumulusCI
CumulusCI
Stacks5
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars384
Forks253

CumulusCI vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

In the realm of CI/CD tools, CumulusCI and Jenkins are two popular choices that offer unique features and functionalities. CumulusCI is a framework specifically tailored for Salesforce development, providing automation tools for Salesforce projects. On the other hand, Jenkins is a widely-used open-source automation server that supports building, deploying, and automating projects across various platforms. Below are key differences between CumulusCI and Jenkins.

1. **Purpose and Focus**: CumulusCI is designed with a specific focus on Salesforce development projects, offering specialized tools and features tailored for this ecosystem. In comparison, Jenkins is a general-purpose automation server that can be used for a wide range of project types and technologies.

2. **Ease of Use**: CumulusCI is known for its ease of use and streamlined integration with Salesforce development tools and processes. In contrast, Jenkins has a steeper learning curve and may require more configuration and setup to fully utilize its capabilities.

3. **Integration with Salesforce Ecosystem**: CumulusCI seamlessly integrates with the Salesforce ecosystem, leveraging Salesforce metadata and APIs to streamline development and deployment tasks. Jenkins, while versatile, may require additional plugins or custom configurations to achieve the same level of integration with Salesforce tools.

4. **Support and Community**: CumulusCI benefits from a dedicated community of Salesforce developers and users who contribute to its development and provide support. Jenkins, being a widely-used open-source tool, has a vast community and extensive plugin ecosystem that can offer solutions and support for a diverse range of use cases.

5. **License and Cost**: CumulusCI is an open-source framework, providing free access to its features and capabilities for Salesforce developers. Jenkins is also open-source but may incur costs for enterprise features or plugins depending on the user's requirements.

6. **Scalability and Extensibility**: While both CumulusCI and Jenkins are scalable tools, Jenkins offers a wider range of plugins and integrations that allow for greater extensibility and customization of automation workflows across different project environments.

In Summary, CumulusCI excels in its specialization for Salesforce development with ease of use and deep integration with the Salesforce ecosystem, while Jenkins offers a broader scope of application, a larger community, and enhanced scalability and extensibility for diverse automation needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
CumulusCI
CumulusCI

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

CumulusCI was built to solve common challenges faced during the development and release of Salesforce managed package projects.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Build sophisticated orgs with automatic installation of dependencies; Load and capture sample datasets to make your orgs feel real; Apply transformations to existing metadata to tailor orgs to your specific requirements; Run builds in continuous integration systems; Create end-to-end browser tests and setup automation using Robot Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
384
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
253
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
5
Followers
50.4K
Followers
11
Votes
2.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, CumulusCI?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana